Revista CEFAC
https://revistacefac.org.br/article/doi/10.1590/S1516-18462011005000091
Revista CEFAC
Artigos Originais

Procesos de simplificación fonológica en niños con fisura labiovelopalatina intervenidos quirúrgicamente

Phonological processes in children with surgery treated cleft lip and palate

Pía Villanueva Bianchini; María Angélica Fernández Gallardo; Maria Loreto Lizana Sánchez; Hernán M. Palomino

Downloads: 0
Views: 289

Resumen

Objetivo: conocer las características del desempeño fonológico en niños con fisura labiovelopalatina uni y bilateral, entre 3 y 4,11 años.

Método: se evaluaron 39 pacientes con fisura labiovelopalatina tratada quirúrgicamente, los cuales fueron divididos en 4 grupos de estudio, según el tipo de fisura (uni o bilateral) y edad (3-3,11 años y 4-4,11 años). Para la determinación de la cantidad, tipo y frecuencia de procesos de simplificación fonológica en el grupo de estudio, se aplicó el Test de Procesos de simplificación fonológica (Chile). Los puntajes obtenidos fueron comparados con la norma a través del análisis estadístico t test y analizados descriptivamente.

Resultados: se observó una cantidad significativamente mayor de procesos fonológicos presentes en niños con fisura respecto a la norma. Para todos los grupos de estudio los procesos fonológicos de simplificación más frecuentes fueron los de sustitución, con excepción del grupo de niños con fisura unilateral de 3-3,11 años, donde los procesos más frecuentes fueron los relativos a la estructura silábica.

Conclusiones: los resultados obtenidos sugieren la necesidad de incluir técnicas de evaluación de la presencia de procesos fonológicos en niños fisurados con el fin que las terapias consideren el entrenamiento para la eliminación de estos procesos en etapas adecuadas del desarrollo, con el fin de mejorar el aspecto conversacional del lenguaje.

Palabras clave

Desarrollo del Lenguaje; Labio Leporino; Fisura del Paladar; Transtornos de la Articulación

Abstract

Purpose: to determine the phonological skills of Chilean children between 3 years and 4 years 11 months old with unilateral and bilateral cleft lip and palate.

Method: a sample of thirty-nine cleft lip and palate children treated with surgery was divided into four different groups according to the type of cleft lip and palate (unilateral and bilateral) and age (3-3,11 years and 4-4,11 years). We were carried out the TEPROSIF test (Chile), in order to determine the amount, type and frequency of simplification phonological processes in the studied group. The scores obtained were compared with the Chilean standard utilizing the t test statistical package. Descriptive statistics were obtained.

Results: more phonologic processes were significantly observed in the cleft group. In all groups the most frequently subtype of simplification phonological processes was the replacement processes' group, except for in the 3-3,11 years of age in unilateral cleft, where the most frequently were the syllabic structure processes.

Conclusion: results suggest the need to include techniques for assessing the presence of phonological processes in cleft children in order to consider the training for eliminating these processes in their therapies in the appropriate stages of development, aiming at improving the language conversational aspect.

Keywords

Language Development; Cleft Lip; Cleft Palate; Articulation Disorders

Referências

1. Nagarajan R, Savitha VH, Subramaniyan B. Communication disorders in individuals with cleft lip and palate: An overview. Indian J Plast Surg 2009;42:S137-43.

2. Pamplona M del C, Ynsunza A, Perez G, Vergara S. Summer school speech therapy for children with cleft palate and labugue disorder. Gac Med Mex. 2009;145:475-9.

3. Priester GH, Goorhuis- Brouwer SM. Speech and language development in toddlers with and without cleft palate. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2008; 72: 801-6.

4. Frederickson MS, Chapman KI, Hardin-Jones M. Conversational skills of children with cleft lip and palate: a replication and extension. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2006 Mar; 43(2):179-88.

5. Zambonato TC, Feniman MR, Blasca WQ, Lauris JR, Maximino LP. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2009;75:888-92.

6. Ruiter JS, Korsten- Meijer AGW, Goorhuis- Brouwer SM. Communicative abilities in toddlers and in early school age children with cleft palate. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2009; 73:693-8.

7. Vallino LD, Zuker R, Napoli JA. A Study of speech, language, hearing, and dentition in children with cleft lip only. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2008 Sept; 45(5):485-94.

8. Chapman KL. Phonologic processes in children with cleft palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1993 Jan; 30(1):64-72.

9. Dodd B, Holm A, Hua Z, Crosbie S. Phonological development: a normative study of British English children. Clin Linguist Phonet. 2003; 17(8):617-43.

10. Gindri G, Keske- Soares M, Mota HB. Working memory, phonological awareness and spelling hypothesis. Pro Fono. 2007 Jul- Sep; 19(3):313-22.

11. Rodrigues A, Befi- Lopes DM. Phonological working memory and its relationship with language development in children. Pro- Fono. 2009 Jan- Mar; 21(1):63-8.

12. Ingram D. Trastornos fonologicos en el nino. Barcelona. Editorial Medica- Tecnica; 1983.

13. Guarini A, Sansavini A, Fabbri C, Alessandroni R, Faldella G, Karmiloff- Smith A. Reconsidering the impact of preterm birth on language outcome. Early Hum Dev. 2009 Oct; 85(10):639- 45.

14. Chen JL, Messner AH, Curtin G. Newborn hearing screening in infants with cleft palates. Otol Neurotol. 2008; 29:812- 5.

15. D'Mello J, Kumar S. Audiological findings in cleft palate patients attending speech camp. Indian J Med Res. 2007; 125:777- 82.

16. Barnes E, Roberts J, Long SH, Martin GE, Berni MC, Mandulak KC, et al. Phonological accuracy and intelligibility in connected speech of boys with fragile X syndrome or Down syndrome. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2009 Aug; 52(4):1048- 61.

17. Scherer NJ, DAntonio LL, McGahey H. Early intervention for speech impairment in children with cleft palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2008; 45:18- 31

18. Alfaro S, Barrera J, de Barbieri Z, Maggiolo M. Presentación de instrumentos de uso habitual en fonoaudiología. Ediciones Escuela de Fonoaudiología, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Chile. Santiago, Chile, 1998.

19. Maggiolo M, Pavez M. Test para evaluar procesos fonologicos de simplificación (TEPROSIF). Ediciones Escuela de Fonoaudiología, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Chile. Santiago, Chile, 2000.

20. Lohmander A, Persson C. A longitudinal study of speech production in Swedish children with unilateral cleft lip and palate and two- stage palatal repair. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2008; 45:32- 41.

21. Chapman K, Hardin M. Phonetic and phonologic skills of two- year- olds with cleft palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1992 Sept; 29(5):435- 43.

22. Morris H., Ozanne A. Phonetic, phonological, and language skills of children with a cleft palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2003 Sept; 40(5):460- 70.

23. Acosta V, Ramos V. Procesos fonologicos: evaluación y tratamiento. Rev CEFAC. 2006; 8(1):27- 35.

24. Konst E, Rietveld T, Peters H, Huijpers- Jagtman A. Language skills of young children with unilateral cleft lip and palate following infant orthopedics: a randomized clinical trial. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2003 Jul; 40(4):356- 62.


Submetido em:
24/12/2009

Aceito em:
13/07/2010

6a477fb0a953950bcc37a512 cefac Articles
Links & Downloads

Revista CEFAC

Share this page
Page Sections