Processamento auditivo, resolução temporal e teste de detecção de gap: revisão da literatura
Auditory processing, temporal resolution and gap detection test: literature review
Alessandra Giannella Samelli; Eliane Schochat
Resumo
Tema: processamento auditivo temporal e resolução temporal.
Objetivo: realizar revisão teórica sobre processamento auditivo e resolução temporal, bem como sobre os diferentes parâmetros de marcadores utilizados em testes de detecção de gap e como eles podem interferir na determinação dos limiares.
Conclusão: o processamento auditivo e a resolução temporal são fundamentais para o desenvolvimento da linguagem. Em virtude dos diferentes parâmetros que podem ser utilizados no teste em questão, os limiares de detecção de gap podem variar consideravelmente.
Palavras-chave
Abstract
Background: temporal auditory processing and temporal resolution.
Purpose: promote a theoretical approach on auditory processing, temporal resolution, and different parameters of markers used at various gap detection tests and how they can interfere in threshold determination.
Conclusion: auditory processing and temporal resolution are key-factors for language development. The diverse parameters that can be used in the study of gap detection thresholds can result in quite discrepant thresholds.
Keywords
Referencias
1. Moore BCJ. An introduction to the psychology of hearing. 5. ed. San Diego: Academic Press; 2003. 373p.
2. Phillips DP. Neural representation of stimulus times in the primary auditory cortex. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1993; 682(1):104-18.
3. Buonomano DV, Karmarkar UR. How do we tell time? Neuroscientist. 2002; 8(1):42-51.
4. Shinn JB. Temporal processing: the basics. Hear J. 2003; 56(7):52.
5. Smith NA, Trainor LJ, Shore DI. The development of temporal resolution: between-channel gap detection in infants and adults. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2006; 49(5):1104-13.
6. Samelli AG, Schochat E. The gaps-in-noise test: gap detection thresholds in normal-hearing young adults. Int J Audiol. 2008; 47(5):238-45
7. Shibata T, Sakashita T, Yamane H, Hashimoto C. Temporal resolution and speech recognition ability of patients with retrocochlear auditory dysfunction. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl. 2004; (554):30-4.
8. Mulsow J, Reichmuth C. Electrophysiological assessment of temporal resolution in pinnipeds. Aquatic Mammals. 2007; 33(1):122-31.
9. Phillips DP, Taylor TL, Hall SE, Carr MM, Mossop JE. Detection of silent intervals between noises activating different perceptual channels: some properties of "central" auditory gap detection. J Acoust Soc Am. 1997; 101(6):3694-705.
10. Eggermont JJ. Firing rate and firing synchrony distinguish dynamic from steady state sound. Neuroreport. 1997; 8(12):2709-13.
11. Muniz LF, Roazzi A, Schochat E, Teixeira CF, Lucena JA. Avaliacao da habilidade de resolucao temporal, com uso do tom puro, em criancas com e sem desvio fonologico. Rev CEFAC. 2007; 9(4):550-62.
12. Baran JA, Musiek FE. Avaliacao comportamental do sistema nervoso auditivo central. In: Musiek FE, Rintelmann WF, organizador. Perspectivas atuais em avaliacao auditiva. Sao Paulo: Manole; 2001. p. 371-409.
13. Watson CS. Temporal acuity and the identification of temporal order: related, but distinct, auditory abilities. Semin Hear. 2004; 25(3):219-27.
14. Divenyi PL. The times of Ira Hirsh: multiple ranges of auditory temporal perception. Semin Hear. 2004; 25(3):229-39.
15. Lister JJ, Roberts RA, Shackelford J, Rogers CL. An adaptive clinical test of temporal resolution. Am J Audiol. 2006; 15(2):133-40.
16. Eggermont JJ. Neural responses in primary auditory cortex mimic psychophysical, acrossfrequency- channel, gap-detection thresholds. J Neurophysiol. 2000 Sep; 84(3):1453-63.
17. Oxenham AJ. Influence of spatial and temporal coding on auditory gap detection. J Acoust Soc Am. 2000; 107(4):2215-23.
18. Rupp A, Gutschalk A, Uppenkamp S, Scherg M. Middle latency auditory evoked fields reflect psychoacoustic gap detection thresholds in human listeners. J Neurophysiol. 2004; 92(4):2239-47.
19. Peiffer AM, Friedman JT, Rosen GD, Fitch RH. Impaired gap detection in juvenile microgricy rats. Brain Res Dev Brain Res. 2004; 152(2):93-8.
20. Plomp R. Rate of decay auditory sensation. J Acoust Soc Am. 1964; 36(2):277-82.
21. He NJ, Horwitz AR, Dubno JR, Mills JH. Psychometric functions for gap detection in noise measured from young and aged subjects. J Acoust Soc Am. 1999; 106(2):966-78.
22. Healy EW, Bacon SP. Effect of spectral frequency range and separation on the perception of asynchronous speech. J Acoust Soc Am. 2007; 121(3):1691-700.
23. Wang J, Fenga Y, Yin S. The effect of gap-marker spectrum on gap-evoked auditory response from the inferior colliculus and auditory cortex of guinea pigs. Int J Audiol. 2006; 45(9):521-7.
24. Heinrich A, Alain C, Schneider BA. Within- and between-channel gap detection in the human auditory cortex. Neuroreport. 2004 Sep; 15(13):2051-6.
25. Elangovan S, Stuart A. Natural boundaries in gap detection are related to categorical perception of stop consonants. Ear Hear. 2008; 29(5):761-74.
26. Carmichael ME, Hall SE, Phillips DP. Ear and contralateral masker effects on auditory temporal gap detection thresholds. Hear Res. 2008 (in press).
27. Musiek FE, Shinn JB, Jirsa R, Bamiou DE, Baran JA, Zaidan E. GIN (gaps in noise) test performance in subjects with confirmed central auditory nervous system involvement. Ear Hear. 2005; 26(6):608-18.
28. Musiek FE, Zaidan EP, Baran JA, Shinn JB, Jirsa RE. Assessing temporal processes in adults with LD: the GIN test. Proceedings of the 2004 Convention Of American Academy of Audiology, Salt Lake City; march-april 2004. p. 203.
29. Roberts RA, Lister JJ. Effects of age and hearing loss on gap detection and the precedence effect: broadband stimuli. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2004; 47(5):965-78.
30. Zaidan E, Garcia AP, Tedesco MLF, Baran JA. Desempenho de adultos jovens normais em dois testes de resolução temporal. Pró-Fono. 2008; 20(1):19-24.
Submitted date:
25/08/2007
Accepted date:
07/02/2008
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Mendeley
Email