Revista CEFAC
https://revistacefac.org.br/article/doi/10.1590/20192152719
Revista CEFAC
Artigos Originais

Cognitive Auditory Evoked Potential in children with speech sound disorders: analysis of different verbal stimuli

Laís Ferreira; Amália El Hatal de Souza; Simone Nicolini de Simoni; Bianca Bertuol; Marileda Barichello Gubiani; Márcia Keske-Soares; Eliara Pinto Vieira Biaggio

Downloads: 0
Views: 331

Abstract

Objective: to analyze the influence of different combinations of verbal stimuli on the responses of the cognitive auditory evoked potential of children with speech sound disorders and to compare the P300 responses, considering the combinations of stimuli in the different severity of speech sound disorders.

Methods: nineteen children in the mean age of 6.75 years old, of both sexes, diagnosed with speech sound disorder, participated in the study. All participants were submitted to the cognitive auditory evoked potential - P300 test, performed with two combinations of verbal stimuli (BA/DI and BA/GA). For statistical analysis it was used the Student T-test.

Results: a statistically significant difference was observed for the latency values (p=<0.001*) and for the amplitude values (p=<0.001*) between the two combinations of stimuli. Also, statistically significant difference was observed between the combinations evaluated in the different severity of the speech sound disorder.

Conclusion: the combination of stimuli /BA/ x /DI/ demonstrated lower latency and higher amplitude values in the Cognitive Evoked Potential assessment in children presented with speech sound disorder.

Keywords

Electrophysiology; Auditory Evoked Potentials; Event-Related Potentials, P300; Child; Speech Sound Disorders

Referências

1. McPherson DL. Late potentials of the auditory system. San Diego: Publishing Group; 1996.

2. Reis AC, Frizzo CF. Potencial evocado auditivo cognitivo. In: Boéchat EM, Menezes PL, Couto CM, Frizzo AC, Scharlach RC, Anastacio AR (eds). Tratado de Audiologia. Rio de Janeiro: Guanabara Koogan; 2015. p.140-50.

3. Prestes R, Andrade AN, Santos RBF, Maragoni AT, Schiefer AM, Gil D. Temporal processing and long-latency auditory evoked potential in stutterers. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2017;83(2):142-6.

4. Cañete OM, Purdy SC, Neeff M, Brown CRS, Thorne PR. Cortical auditory evoked potential (CAEP) and behavioural measures of auditory function in a child with a single-sided deafness. Cochlear Implants Int. 2017;18(6):1-12.

5. Papagiannopoulou EA, Lagopoulos J. P300 event-related potentials in children with dyslexia. Ann Dyslexia. 2017;67(1):99-108.

6. Wang S, Yang C, Liu Y, Shao Z, Jackson T. Early and late stage processing abnormalities in autism spectrum disorders: an ERP study. PLoS One. 2017;12(5):e0178542.

7. Advíncula KP, Griz SMS, Frizzo ACF, Pessoa ACRG, Leite-Barros PMA, Gurgel E. Potenciais evocados auditivos de longa latência em crianças com desvio fonológico. Distúrb. Comun. 2008;20(2):171-81.

8. Leite RA, Wertzner HF, Matas CG. Long latency auditory evoked potentials in children with phonological disorder. Pró-Fono R Atual. 2010;22(4):561-6.

9. Leite RA, Wertzner HF, Gonçalves IC, Magliaro FCL, Matas CG. Auditory evoked potentials: predicting speech therapy outcomes in children with phonological disorders. CLINICS. 2014;69(3):212-8.

10. Ceron MI, Gubiani MB, Oliveira CRD, Gubiani MB, Keske-Soares M. Prevalence of phonological disorders and phonological processes in typical and atypical phonological development. CoDAS. 2017;29(3):1-9.

11. Samelli AG, Rondon-Melo S, Rabelo CM, Molini-Avejonas DR. Association between language and hearing disorders–risk identification. Clinics. 2017;72(4):213-7.

12. Melo Â, Mezzomo CL, Garcia MV, Biaggio EPV. Effects of computerized auditory training in children with auditory processing disorder and typical and atypical phonological system. Audiol. Commun. Res. 2016;21:e1683.

13. Murphy CFB, Pagan-Neves LO, Wertzner HF, Schochat E. Children with speech sound disorder: comparing a non-linguistic auditory approach with a phonological intervention approach to improve phonological skills. Front Psychol. 2015;6:64.

14. Vilela N, Barrozo TF, Pagan-Neves LO, Sanches SGG, Wertzner HF, Carvallo RMM. The influence of (central) auditory processing disorder on the severity of speech-sound disorders in children. Clinics. 2016;71(2):62-8.

15. Brancalioni AR, Bertagnolli APC, Bonini JB, Gubiani MB, Keske-Soares M. The relation between auditory discrimination and phonological disorder. J Soc Bras Fonoaudiol. 2012;24(2):157-61.

16. Freitas CRD, Mezzomo CL, Vidor DCGM. Phonemic discrimination and the relationship with other linguistic levels in children with typical phonological development and phonological disorder. CoDAS. 2015;27(3):236-41.

17. Melo ÂD, Mezzomo CL, Garcia MV, Biaggio EPV. Computerized auditory training in students: electrophysiological and subjective analysis of therapeutic effectiveness. Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2018;22(1):23-32.

18. Alvarenga KF, Vicente LC, Lopes RCF, da Silva RA, Banhara MR, Lopes AC et al. The influence of speech stimuli contrast in cortical auditory evoked potentials. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2013;79(3):336-41.

19. Matas CG, Silva FBL, Carrico B, Leite RA, Magliaro FCL. Long-latency auditory evoked potentials in sound field in normal-hearing children. Audiol Commun Res. 2015;20(4):305-12.

20. Silva LSD, Regaçone SF, Oliveira ACSD, Oliveira LSD, Fernandes FT, Frizzo ACF. Auditory cortical potential: using different types of speech stimuli in children. Audiol Commu Res. 2017;22:e1788.

21. Francelino EG, Reis CFC, Melo T. The use of P300 with speech stimulus for monitoring the auditory training. Distúrb. Comun. 2014;26(1):27-34.

22. Ceron MI, Gubiani MB, Oliveira CRD, Keske-Soares M. Evidence of validity and reliability of a phonological assessment tool. CoDAS. 2018;30:e20170180-e20170180.

23. Seabra AG, Capovilla FC. Prova de Consciência Fonológica por produção oral. In: Seabra AG, Dias NM (eds). Avaliação neuropsicológica cognitiva: linguagem oral. São Paulo: Memnon; 2012. p.116-20.

24. Shriberg LD, Austin D, Lewis BA, McSweeny JL, Wilson DL. The speech disorders classification system (SDCS): extensions and lifespan reference data. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1997;40(4):723-40.

25. Almeida RP, Matas CG. Long latency auditory evoked potentials in malnourished children. CoDAS. 2013;25(5):407-12.

26. Agostinho-Pesse RS, Alvarenga KF. Late auditory evoked potentials to speech stimuli presented with different transducers in hearing children. Rev. CEFAC. 2014;16(1):13-22.

27. Melo RM, Mota HB, Mezzomo CL, Brasil BC, Lovatto L, Arzeno L. Parâmetros acústicos do contraste de sonoridade das plosivas no desenvolvimento fonológico típico e no desviante. Rev Soc Bras Fonoau. 2012;17(3):304-12.

28. Didoné DD, Oppitz SJ, Silva DD, Gois M, Folgearini JS, Ferreira GC et al. P3 cortical potential: difficulty level for different stimulus. Audiol Commun Res. 2015;20(3):233-8.

29. Orduña I, Liu EH, Church BA, Eddins AC, Mercado E. Evoked-potential changes following discrimination learning involving complex sounds. Clin Neurophysiol. 2012;123(4):711-9.


Submetido em:
25/03/2019

Aceito em:
18/09/2019

6a25e23fa95395041235e9f4 cefac Articles
Links & Downloads

Revista CEFAC

Share this page
Page Sections