Essential aspects in the design of data collection instruments in primary health research
Aspectos essenciais na construção de instrumentos de coleta de dados em pesquisas primárias de saúde
Débora Butka Thomas; Nágila Soares Xavier Oenning; Bárbara Niegia Garcia de Goulart
Abstract
Objective: to investigate the literature production on the design of forms for research in the health area and describe the most relevant concepts and precepts of the topic.
Methods: an integrative literature review in the PubMed and Scielo databases with the key words: survey, constructing, questionnaire, formulary, development and design in various combinations, including articles published in any language in the last ten years. The survey returned 1,480 articles, and after reading and critically reviewing the abstracts according to the objective of the study, 16 articles were selected for complete reading. Information regarding aspects that were most relevant to the objective of the study was analyzed, as well as its recurrence in the selected articles.
Results: the reading of the 16 articles resulted in three categories, based on the recurrence of the themes: structure, validation and sampling.
Conclusion: clarity in the formulation of the questions was the most valued aspect in the structure of the instrument. As for validation, the realization of pilot tests was considered fundamental. Finally, the method of administration and adaptation of the questionnaire to target population was considered fundamental.
Keywords
Resumo
Objetivo: verificar a literatura sobre a construção de formulários de pesquisas em saúde e descrever os conceitos e preceitos mais relevantes do tema.
Métodos: revisão integrativa da literatura realizada nas bases Pubmed e Scielo com as palavras-chave: survey, constructing, questionnaire, formulary, development e design em diversas combinações, incluindo artigos em qualquer língua e publicados nos últimos dez anos. A pesquisa retornou 1480 artigos e após leitura e análise crítica dos resumos de acordo com o objetivo, 16 estudos foram selecionados para leitura na íntegra. Foi realizada a análise das informações dos aspectos mais relevantes para o objetivo do estudo e a sua recorrência nas pesquisas selecionadas.
Resultados: dentre os 16 artigos foram encontradas três categorias baseadas na recorrência dos temas: estrutura, validação e amostragem.
Conclusão: a clareza na formulação das perguntas foi o aspecto mais valorizado em relação à estrutura do instrumento, enquanto que para a validação, é fundamental realizar o teste-piloto; e ainda, a forma de administração e a adaptação do questionário deve ser considerada para a população à qual se aplica.
Palavras-chave
Referências
1. Canario JA, Lizardo J, Espinal R, Colomé M. Gaps in health research in the Dominican Republic. Rev Panam Salud Publica Pan Am J Public Health. 2016;39(4):179-85.
2. Nuyens Y. No development without research a challenge for research capacity strengthening. Genève (Suisse): Global Forum of Health; 2005.
3. Moloney A. Latin America faces hurdles in health research. The Lancet. 2009;374(9695):1053-4.
4. Dell-Kuster S, Sanjuan E, Todorov A, Weber H, Heberer M, Rosenthal R. Designing questionnaires: healthcare survey to compare two different response scales. BMC Med Res Methodol [Internet]. 2014 Dec [cited 2018 Feb 25];14(1). Available from: http://bmcmedresmethodol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2288-14-96
5. Jones R. Development of a Questionnaire and Cross-Sectional Survey of Patient eHealth Readiness and eHealth Inequalities. Med 20. 2013;2(2):e9.
6. Jenn NC. Designing A Questionnaire. Malays Fam Physician Off J Acad Fam Physicians Malays. 2006;1(1):32-5.
7. Thwaites Bee D, Murdoch-Eaton D. Questionnaire design: the good, the bad and the pitfalls. Arch Dis Child - Educ Pract Ed. 2016;101(4):210-2.
8. Rattray J, Jones MC. Essential elements of questionnaire design and development. J Clin Nurs. 2007;16(2):234-43.
9. Bryson GL, Turgeon AF, Choi PT. The science of opinion: survey methods in research. Can J Anesth Can Anesth. 2012;59(8):736-42.
10. Kazi AM, Khalid W. Questionnaire designing and validation. JPMA J Pak Med Assoc. 2012;62(5):514-6.
11. Song Y, Son Y-J, Oh D. Methodological issues in Questionnaire Design. J Korean Acad Nurs. 2015;45(3):323.
12. Yébenes Prous MJG, Rodríguez Salvanés F, Carmona Ortells L. Validación de cuestionarios. Reumatol Clínica. 2009;5(4):171-7.
13. Hutz CS, Bandeira DR, Trentini CM (ed). Psicometria. Porto Alegre: Artmed Editora; 2015.
14. Goulart BNG de, Ferreira J. Speech disorder screening test for children. Pro-Fono R Atual. Cientif. 2009;21(3):231-6.
15. Smith CJ. Designing a research study. Phlebol J Venous Dis. 2011;26(8):369-70.
16. Doody O, Bailey ME. Setting a research question, aim and objective. Nurse Res. 2016;23(4):19-23.
17. Jones T, Baxter M, Khanduja V. A quick guide to survey research. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2013;95(1):5-7.
18. Bobrovitz N, Santana MJ, Ball CG, Kortbeek J, Stelfox HT. The development and testing of a survey to measure patient and family experiences with injury care. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012;73(5):1332-9.
19. Slattery EL, Voelker CCJ, Nussenbaum B, Rich JT, Paniello RC, Neely JG. A practical guide to surveys and questionnaires. Otolaryngol-Head Neck Surg. 2011;144(6):831-7.
20. Pittman J, Bakas T. Measurement and instrument design. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2010;37(6):603-7.
21. Burford B, Hesketh A, Wakeling J, Bagnall G, Colthart I, Illing J et al. Asking the right questions and getting meaningful responses: 12 tips on developing and administering a questionnaire survey for healthcare professionals. Med Teach. 2009;31(3):207-11.
Submetido em:
05/03/2018
Aceito em:
11/09/2018


