Teaching language components to deaf/hard-of-hearing and cochlear implant users: a literature review
Ensino de componentes da linguagem a usuários de implante coclear: revisão da literatura
Fernando Del Mando Lucchesi; Ana Claudia Moreira Almeida-Verdu
Abstract
Cochlear implants are one of the possible ways for Deaf or Hard-of-Hearing (DHH) individuals to detect sounds and as a mean of insertion in the social, academic and work environments. Nevertheless, in many cases, the cochlear implant alone is not sufficient, demanding hearing and expressive language skills rehabilitation to optimize the device used. This study aimed at reviewing scientific articles that described empirical research with interventions and/or teaching methods of various language repertoires to deaf and hard-of-hearing cochlear implant users. The review was carried out in five scientific databases considering all periods. On the first phase, 156 articles were identified and from these, 24 publications were selected. After being read, these articles were categorized and analyzed as to the participants, teaching targets and procedures adopted. On the last stage of the research, 10 experimental studies were selected and analyzed regarding procedures and results, indicating important factors in teaching this population. The results point to the necessity of an increase of scientific production in the construction and evaluation of effective verbal repertoires teaching programs for cochlear implant users.
Keywords
Resumo
O indivíduo com deficiência auditiva encontra no implante coclear um dispositivo de reabilitação da capacidade de detectar sons e de inserção no meio social, acadêmico e do trabalho. No entanto, em muitos casos, apenas o implante não é suficiente, sendo necessário investimento na reabilitação de habilidades auditivas e da linguagem expressiva para otimizar o uso do dispositivo. O presente estudo teve como objetivo revisar artigos científicos que apresentem estudos empíricos da aplicação de intervenções e/ou métodos de ensino de repertórios de linguagem diversos a população com deficiência auditiva e usuária de implante coclear. O levantamento foi realizado em cinco bases de dados em qualquer período. Na primeira etapa foram levantadas 156 publicações, e destes, 24 artigos foram selecionados. A partir da leitura, os artigos foram categorizados e analisados quanto aos participantes, alvos de ensino e procedimentos empregados. Na última etapa da pesquisa, 10 estudos experimentais foram selecionados e analisados quanto aos procedimentos e resultados, indicando alguns fatores importantes no ensino com esta população. Os resultados sugerem a necessidade de uma maior e mais sistemática produção científica na construção e avaliação de programas de ensino de repertórios verbais efetivos para a população usuária de implante coclear.
Palavras-chave
Referências
1. Bevilacqua MC, Formigoni GMP. Audiologia educacional: Uma opção terapêutica para a criança deficiente auditiva. Carapicuíba: Pró-Fono; 2000.
2. Ertmer DJ, Goffman L. Speech production accuracy and variability in young cochlear implant recipients: comparisons with typically developing age-peers. J speech lang hear res. 2011;54(1):177-89.
3. Uziel AS, Sillon M, Vieu A, Artieres F, Piron JP, Daures JP et al. Ten-year follow-up of a consecutive series of children with multichannel cochlear implants. Otol Neurotol. 2007;28(5):615-28.
4. Beadle EAR, McKinley DJ, Nikolopoulos TP, Brough J, O'Donoghue GM, Archbold SM. Long-term functional outcomes and academic-occupational status in implanted children after 10 to 14 years of cochlear implant use. Otol Neurotol. 2005;26(6):1152-60.
5. Weisi F, Rezaei M, Rashedi V, Heidari A, Valadbeigi A, Ebrahimi-Pour M. Comparison of reading skills between children with cochlear implants and children with typical hearing in Iran. Int j pediatr otorhinolaryngol. 2013;77(8):1317-21.
6. Boons T, Brokx JPL, Shooge I, Frijins JHM, Peeraer L, Vermeulen A et al. Predictors of spoken language development following pediatric cochlear implantation. Ear Hear. 2012;33(5):627-39.
7. Kubo O, Botomé SP. Ensino-Aprendizagem: uma interação entre dois processos comportamentais. Interação. 2001;5(1):123-32.
8. Almeida-Verdu ACM, da Silva WR, Golfeto RM. Linguagem e comportamento verbal em surdos implantados: revisão da literatura e perspectivas de estudos. Anais do III Congresso Brasileiro de Educação Especial; 2-5 Dez 2008; São Carlos; 2008.
9. Neves AJ, Almeida-Verdu ACM, Moret ALM, Silva LTN. The implications of the cochlear implant for development of language skills: A literature review Rev. CEFAC. 2015;17(5):1643-56.
10. Kazdin AE. Single-case research designs: methods for clinical and applied settings. New York: Oxford University Press; 1982.
11. Tucci SL, Trussell JW, Easterbrooks SR. A review of the evidence on the strategies for teaching children who are DHH grapheme-phoneme correspondence. Commun Disord Q. 2014;35(4):191-203. Doi: 10.1177/1525740114523776
12. Schopmeyer B, Mellon N, Dobaj H, Grant G, Niparko JK. Use of Fast ForWord to enhance language development in children with cochlear implants. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. Suppl. 2000;185:95-8.
13. Connor CM, Hieber S, Arts HA, Zwolan TA. Speech, Vocabulary, and the education of children using cochlear implants: oral or total communication? J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2000;43(5):1185-204.
14. Abdi S, Khalessi MH, Khorsandi M, Gholami B. Introducing music as a means of habilitation for children with cochlear implants. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2001;59(2):105-13.
15. Sarant J. cochlear implants in children: a review. In: Naz S. (ed.) Hearing Loss. Shanghai: InTech; 2012. p. 40-75.
16. Raver SA, Bobzien J, Richels C, Hester P, Anthony N. Using dyad-specific social stories to increase communicative and social skills of preschoolers with hearing loss in self-contained and inclusive settings. International Journal of Inclusive Education. 2014;18(1):18-35. Doi: 10.1080/13603116.2012.756543
17. Lund E, Schuele CM. Effects of a word-learning training on children with cochlear implants. J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2014;19(1):68-84.
18. Richels CG, Schwartz KS, Bobzien JL, Raver SA. Structured instruction with modified storybooks to teach morphosyntax and vocabulary to preschoolers who are deaf/hard of hearing. J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2016;21(4):352-61. Doi: 10.1093/deafed/enw049.
19. Bobzien JL, Richels C, Schwartz K, Raver SA, Hester P, Morin L. Using repeated reading and explicit instruction to teach vocabulary to preschoolers with hearing loss. Infants Young Child. 2015;28(3):262-80. Doi: 10.1097/IYC.0000000000000039
20. Anastácio-Pessan FL, Almeida-Verdu ACM, Bevilacqua MC, de Souza DG. Usando o paradigma de equivalência para aumentar a correspondência na fala de crianças com implante coclear na nomeação de figuras e na leitura. Psicol Reflex Crít. 2015;28(2):365-77.
21. Lucchesi FD, Almeida-Verdu ACM, Buffa MJMB, Bevilacqua MC. Efeitos de um programa de ensino de leitura sobre a inteligibilidade da fala de crianças usuárias de implante coclear. Psicol Reflex Crít. 2015;28(3):500-10.
22. Lew J, Purcell AA, Doble M, Lim LH. Hear here: children with hearing loss learn words by listening. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2014;78(10):1716-25.
23. Lund E, Douglas M. Teaching vocabulary to preschool children with hearing loss. Except child. 2016;83(1):26-41. Doi: 10.1177/0014402916651848
24. Innes-Brown H, Marozeau JP, Storey CM, Blamey PJ. Tone, rhythm, and timbre perception in school-age children using cochlear implants and hearing aids. J Am Acad Audiol. 2013;24(9):789-806.
25. Messier J, Wood C. Facilitating vocabulary acquisition of children with cochlear implants using electronic storybooks. J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2015;20(4):356-73. Doi:10.1093/deafed/env031.
26. Stacey PC, Raine CH, O'Donoghue GM, Tapper L, Twomey T, Summerfield AQ. Effectiveness of computer-based auditory training for adult users of cochlear implants. Int J Audiol. 2010;49(5):347-56.
27. Stacey PC, Summerfield AQ. Comparison of word-, sentence-, and phoneme-based training strategies in improving the perception of spectrally distorted speech. J speech lang hear res. 2008;51(2):526-38.
28. Nogaki G, Fu Q, Galvin III JJ. The effect of training rate on recognition of spectrally shifted speech. Ear Hear. 2007;28(2):132-40.
29. Faulkner A, Rosen S, Green T. Comparing live to recorded speech in training the perception of spectrally shifted noise-vocoded speech. J Acoust Soc Am. 2012;132(4):336-42.
30. Kosaner J, Kilinc A, Deniz M. Developing a music programme for preschool children with cochlear implants. Cochlear Implants Int. 2012;13(4):237-47.
31. Clare Allen M, Kendrick A, Archbold S, Harrigan S. LEAPing on with language: An on-line language programme to support classroom teachers and parents of primary school children (aged 5-11 years). Cochlear Implants Int. 2014;15(S1):36-8. Doi:10.1179/1467010014Z.000000000169
32. Nakeva von Mentzer C, Lyxell B, Sahlén B, Dahlström O, Lindgren M, Ors M et al. Computer-assisted reading intervention with a phonics approach for children using cochlear implants or hearing aids. Scand J Psychol. 2014;55(5):448-55. Doi: 10.1111/sjop.12149.
33. Suskind DL, Graf E, Leffel KR, Hernandez MW, Suskind E, Webber R et al. Project ASPIRE: Spoken language intervention curriculum for parents of low-socioeconomic status and their Deaf and Hard-of-Hearing Children. Otol Neurotol. 2016;37(2):110-17. Doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000931.
34. Douglas M. Improving spoken language outcomes for children with hearing loss: Data-driven Instruction. Otol Neurotol. 2016;37(2):13-9. Doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000902.
35. Smith A, Wang Y. The impact of visual phonics on the phonological awareness and speech production of a student who is deaf: a case study. Am Ann Deaf. 2010;155(2):124-30.
36. Torres S, Moreno-Torres I, Santana R. Quantitative and qualitative evaluation of linguistic input support to a prelingually deaf child with cued speech: A case study. J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2006;11(4):438-48.
37. Almeida-Verdu ACM, Golfeto R. Condições de ensino da linguagem: dicas para pais e profissionais. Bauru: Joarte Gráfica e Editora; 2012.
38. Byiers BJ, Reichle J, Symons FJ. Single-subject experimental design for evidence-based practice. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2012;21(4):397-414.
39. Almeida-Verdu ACM, Golfeto RM. Stimulus control and verbal behavior: (in)dependent relations in populations with minimal verbal repertoires. In: Todorov JC (Ed.) Trends in behavior analysis, Vol 1. Brasília: Technopolitik Editora; 2016. p.187-227.
40. Brandau R, Monteiro R, Braile DM. Importância do uso correto dos descritores nos artigos científicos. Rev bras cir cardiovasc. 2005;20(1):7-9.
Submetido em:
19/04/2017
Aceito em:
02/10/2017
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Mendeley
Email