Revista CEFAC
https://revistacefac.org.br/article/doi/10.1590/1982-021620171932617
Revista CEFAC
Review Articles

Vocal dose: an integrative literature review

Dose vocal: uma revisão integrativa da literatura

Joana Perpétuo Assad; Max de Castro Magalhães; Juliana Nunes Santos; Ana Cristina Côrtes Gama

Downloads: 0
Views: 479

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to perform a literature review about the vocal doses and the behavior of these measurements in different communicative situations.

Methods: A review on MEDLINE, LILACS, IBECS and ISI Web of Science databases of the literature written in English, Spanish and Portuguese, within the past twenty-one years, of articles which were fully available, was performed.

Results: Fifteen studies met the set criteria. The majority of the articles studied teachers, since they belong to a vulnerable group for dysphonia. The doses found were phonation percentage, time dose, cycle dose, distance dose, energy dissipation dose and radiated energy dose. The vocal dose increase is associated with an excessive and prolonged voice use in teaching activity, especially when teaching young children and teaching music. The high vocal doses are also associated with the presence of dysphonia, the background noise, the large prosodic variation in speech and the self-perception of vocal fatigue. Patients with behavioral dysphonia (nodes and polyps) present higher vocal doses than patients with other types of dysphonia.

Conclusion: Factors such as voice rest and use of voice amplifiers indicate a decrease of vocal dose.

Keywords

Dosage; Voice; Dysphonia; Voice Disorders; Vocal Cords

Resumo

Objetivo: O objetivo da pesquisa foi realizar uma revisão da literatura referente aos tipos de dose vocal e aos resultados destas medidas em diferentes situações comunicativas.

Métodos: Houve levantamento da literatura nacional e internacional, publicada nos idiomas Inglês, Espanhol ou Português, utilizando-se as bases de dados MEDLINE, LILACS, IBECS e ISI (Web of Science), dos últimos 21 anos, cujos artigos estavam disponíveis na íntegra.

Resultados: Quinze estudos contemplaram os critérios propostos. A maioria dos artigos estudou professores, visto que são mais vulneráveis para a ocorrência de disfonia. Os tipos de dose encontrados foram porcentagem de fonação, dose temporal, dose cíclica, dose de distância, dose de energia radiada e dose de energia dissipada. O aumento da dose vocal está associado ao uso excessivo e prolongado da voz na atividade docente, principalmente entre os professores da educação infantil e os de canto. As altas doses vocais correlacionam-se também à presença de disfonia, ao maior nível de ruído ambiental, à grande variação prosódica na fala e à autopercepção de fadiga vocal. Pacientes com disfonia comportamental (nódulos e pólipos) apresentam maiores doses vocais que pacientes com outros quadros disfônicos.

Conclusão: Fatores como repouso de voz e uso do amplificador vocal indicam a diminuição da dose da voz.

Palavras-chave

Dosagem; Voz; Disfonia; Distúrbios da Voz; Pregas Vocais

References

1. Svec JG, Popolo PS, Titze IR. Measurement of vocal doses in speech: experimental procedure and signal processing. Logoped Phoniatr Vocol. 2003;28(4):181-92.

2. Carroll T, Nix J, Hunter E, Emerich K, Titze I, Abaza M. Objective measurement of vocal fatigue in classical singers: a vocal dosimetry pilot study. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2006;135(4):595-602.

3. Cheyne HA, Hanson HM, Genereux RP, Stevens KN, Hillman RE. Development and testing of a portable vocal accumulator. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2003;46(6):1457-67.

4. Rantala L, Vilkman E. Relationship between subjective voice complaints and acoustic parameters in female teachers' voices. J Voice. 1999;13(4):484-95.

5. Nacci A, Fattori B, Mancini V, Panicucci E, Ursino F, Cartaino FM et al. The Use and Role of the Ambulatory Phonation Monitor (APM) in Voice Assessment. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2013;33(1):49-55.

6. Ryu S, Komiyama S, Kannae S, Watanabe H. A newly devised speech accumulator. J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec. 1983;45(2):108-14.

7. Titze IR, Svec JG, Popolo PS. Vocal dose measures: quantifying accumulated vibration exposure in vocal fold tissues. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2003;46(4):919-32.

8. Galvão TF, Pereira MG. Revisões sistemáticas da literatura: passos para sua elaboração. Epidemiol Serv Saúde. 2014; 23(1):183-184.

9. Gaskill CS, O'Brien SG, Tinter SR. The effect of voice amplification on occupational vocal dose in elementary school teachers. J Voice. 2012;26(5):667.e19-27.

10. Echternach M, Nusseck M, Dippold S, Spahn C, Richter B. Fundamental frequency, sound pressure level and vocal dose of a vocal loading test in comparison to a real teaching situation. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2014;271(12):3263-8.

11. Remacle A, Morsomme D, Finck C. Comparison of vocal loading parameters in kindergarten and elementary school teachers. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2014;57(2):406-15.

12. Schloneger MJ. Graduate student voice use and vocal efficiency in an opera rehearsal week: a case study. J Voice. 2011;25(6):e265-73.

13. Morrow SL, Connor NP. Voice amplification as a means of reducing vocal load for elementary music teachers. J Voice. 2011;25(4):441-6.

14. Morrow SL, Connor NP. Comparison of voice-use profiles between elementary classroom and music teachers. J Voice. 2011;25(3):367-72.

15. Mehta DD, Van Stan JH, Zañartu M, Ghassemi M, Guttag JV, Espinoza VM et al. Using Ambulatory Voice Monitoring to Investigate Common Voice Disorders: Research Update. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2015;3(155):1-14.

16. Titze IR, Hunter EJ. Comparison of Vocal Vibration-Dose Measures for Potential-Damage Risk Criteria. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2015;58(5):1425-39.

17. Assunção AA, Bassi IB, de Medeiros AM, Rodrigues CS, Gama ACC. Occupational and individual risk factors for dysphonia in teachers. Occupational Medicine. 2012;62(7):553-9.

18. Giannini SPP, Latorre MRD, Ferreira LP. Distúrbio de voz e estresse no trabalho docente: um estudo caso-controle. Cad. Saúde Pública. 2012;28(11):2115-24.

19. Behlau M, Zambon F, Guerrireri AC, Roy N. Epidemiology of Voice Disorders in Teachers and Nonteachers in Brazil: Prevalence and Adverse Effects. J Voice. 2012;26(5):665.e9–665.e18.

20. Rossi-Barbosa LAR, Barbosa MR, Morais RM, Sousa KF, Silveira MF, Gama ACC, Caldeira AP. Self-Reported Acute and Chronic Voice Disorders in Teachers. J Voice; 2016, in press.

21. Gama AC, Santos JN, Pedra EF, Rabelo AT, Magalhães MC, Las Casas EB. Dose vocal em professores: correlação com a presença de disfonia. CoDAS. 2016;28(2):190-2.

22. Medeiros AM, Assunção AA, Barreto SM. Absenteeism due to voice disorders in female teachers: a public health problem. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2012;85(8):853-64.

23. Schloneger MJ, Hunter EJ. Assessments of Voice Use and Voice Quality Among College/University Singing Students Ages 18-24 Through Ambulatory Monitoring With a Full Accelerometer Signal. J Voice. 2017 Jan;31(1):124.e21-124.e30.

24. Martins RH, Pereira ER, Hidalgo CB, Tavares EL. Voice disorders in teachers: a review. J Voice. 2014;28(6):716-24.

25. Misono S, Banks K, Gaillard P, Goding GS Jr, Yueh B. The clinical utility of vocal dosimetry for assessing voice rest. Laryngoscope. 2015;125(1):171-6.

26. Van Stan JH, Mehta DD, Zeitels SM, Burns JA, Barbu AM, Hillman RE. Average ambulatory measures of sound pressure level, fundamental frequency, and vocal dose do not differ between adult females with phonotraumatic lesions and matched control subjects. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2015; 124(11): 864-74.

27. Thibeault SL, Merrill RM, Roy N, Gray SD, Smith EM. Occupational risk factors associated with voice disorders among teachers. Ann Epidemiol. 2004;14(10):786-92.

28. Guidini RF, Fabiana Bertoncello F, Zanchetta S, Dragone ML. Correlações entre ruído ambiental em sala de aula e voz do professor. Rev. soc. bras. fonoaudiol. 2012;17(4):398-404.

29. Zollinger SA, Brumm H. The Lombard effect. Current Biology. 2011;21(16):R614-R615.

30. Simões-Zenari M, Bitar ML, Nemr NK. Efeito do ruído na voz de educadoras de instituições de educação infantil. Rev. Saúde Pública. 2012;46(4):657-64.

31. McHenry M, Evans J, Powitzky E. Vocal Assessment Before, After, and the Day After Opera Performance. J Voice; 2016, in press.

32. Solomon NP, DiMattia MS. Effects of a vocally fatiguing task and systemic hydration on phonation threshold pressure. J Voice. 2000;14(3):341-62.

33. Teixeira LC, Behlau M. Comparison Between Vocal Function Exercises and Voice Amplification. J Voice. 2015;29(6):718-26.

34. Bovo R, Trevisi P, Emanuelli E, Martini A. Voice amplification for primary school teachers with voice disorders: a randomized clinical trial. Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2013 Jun;26(3):363-72.


Submitted date:
02/14/2017

Accepted date:
04/24/2017

6a17a32ea9539568505f9ae4 cefac Articles

Revista CEFAC

Share this page
Page Sections