Revista CEFAC
https://revistacefac.org.br/article/doi/10.1590/1982-021620161832516
Revista CEFAC
Artigos Originais

Clinical assessment of the tongue in healthy young adults

Avaliação clínica da língua em adultos jovens

Bárbara Antunes Rezende; Renata Maria Moreira Moraes Furlan; Estevam Barbosa de Las Casas; Andréa Rodrigues Motta

Downloads: 0
Views: 344

Abstract

Purpose: to verify the relationship between the aspects of tongue clinical evaluation.

Methods: a cross-sectional study was conducted with 48 healthy adults, 13 men and 35 women (ages 20-44 years, M=24.8 years, SD=5.3years). The following aspects were checked: tongue force, alternate movements, snap, suctionand vibration of the tongue. The evaluator also checked ifthe floor of the mouth elevated during tasks of tongue elevation or sucking tongue on palateand the occurrence of lingual tremor.

Results: the aspects with the most frequent alteration were sucking tongue on palate and tongue vibration.Tremor had a higher occurrence during tongue movements.We found statistically significant association between snap and vibration and between vibration and elevation of the floor of the mouth during elevation of the tongue. Tongue force was associated with snap, vibration and elevation of the floor of the mouth during tongue elevation.

Conclusion: the level of force influences lingual praxis performance. Vibration changes tend to be accompanied by other difficulties.

Keywords

Tongue; Muscle Strength; Evaluation; Stomatognathic System; Speech, Language and Hearing Sciences

Resumo

Objetivo: verificar a existência de associação entre os aspectos da avaliação clínica da língua.

Métodos: foi realizado um estudo transversal, com 48 adultos saudáveis, 13 homens e 35 mulheres (idades entre 20 e 44 anos, M=24,8 anos, DP=5,3 anos). Os seguintes aspectos foram avaliados: tensão, movimentos alternados, estalo de língua, sucção de língua no palato e vibração de língua. O avaliador também verificou se o assoalho da boca se elevava durante as tarefas de elevação de língua e sucção de língua no palato e a ocorrência de tremor lingual.

Resultados: os aspectos com maior número de indivíduos alterados foram sucção de língua no palato e vibração de língua. Tremor apresentou grande ocorrência durante as tarefas de mobilidade. Verificou-se associação estatisticamente significante entre estalo e vibração de língua; e entre vibração e elevação do assoalho da boca durante elevação da língua. Houve associação também entre tensão da língua e as variáveis estalo, vibração de língua e elevação do assoalho da boca durante a elevação da língua.

Conclusão: o grau de tensão da língua influencia o desempenho de praxias linguais. As alterações de vibração tendem a vir acompanhadas de outras dificuldades.

Palavras-chave

Língua; Força Muscular; Avaliação; Sistema Estomatognático; Fonoaudiologia

Referências

1. Zemlin W. Princípios de anatomia e fisiologia em Fonoaudiologia. 4ªed. Porto Alegre: Artes Médicas; 2000.

2. Kier WM, Smith KK. Tongues, tentacles and trunks: the biomechanics and movement of muscular hydrostats. Zool J Linn Soc.1985;83:307-24.

3. Marchesan IQ, Berretin-Félix G, Genaro KF. MBGR Protocol of myofunctional evaluation with scores. Int J Orof Myol. 2012;38:38-77.

4. Felício CM, Folha GA, Ferreira CLP, Medeiros APM. Expanded protocol of orofacial myofunctional evaluation with scores: validity and reliability. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2010;7411:1230-9.

5. Furlan RMMM, Motta AR, Valentim AF, Barroso MFS, Costa CG, Las Casas EB. Protrusive tongue strength in people with severely weak tongues. Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2013;15:503-10.

6. Almeida LD, Furlan RMMM, Las Casas EB, Motta AR. Influence of height, weight and body index in the axial tongue force. J Soc Bras Fonoaudioll. 2012;244:381-5.

7. Furlan RMMM, Valentim AF, Motta AR, Barroso MFS, Costa CG, Las Casas EB. Métodos quantitativos para avaliação da força de língua. Rev Cefac. 2012;14:1215-25.

8. Vanderwegen J, Guns C, Van Nuffelen G, Elen R, Bodt MD. The influence of age, sex, bulb position, visual feedback, and the order of testing on maximum anterior and posterior tongue strength and endurance in healthy Belgian adults. Dysphagia. 2013;28:159-66.

9. Youmans SR, Stierwalt JA. Measures of tongue function related to normal swallowing. Dysphagia. 2006;212:102-11.

10. Youmans SR, Youmans GL, Stierwalt JAG. Differences in tongue strength across age and gender: is there a diminished strength reserve? Dysphagia. 2009;241:57-65.

11. Rezende BA, Furlan RMMM, Las Casas EB, Motta AR. Relationship between clinical and instrumental assessment of the tongue in healthy young adults. CoDAS. 2015;273:260-6.

12. Oliveira LR, Araújo RLT, Canton PC, Arruda MGOM, Marchesan IQ. Analysis of the occurrence of non-verbal praxis in preschool children. In: Congresso Brasileiro de Fonoaudiologia; 2008 Sep 24-27; Campos do Jordão. Proceedings. Campos do Jordão. 2008;1196.

13. Farias SR, Ávila CRB, Vieira MM. Relationship between speech, tonus and non-verbal praxis of the stomatognathic system in preschoolers. Pró-Fono. 2006;183:67-76.

14. Solomon NP, Munson B. The effect of jaw position on measures of tongue strength and endurance. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2004;47:584-94.

15. Palmer PM, Jaffe DM, McCulloch TM, Finnegan EM, Van Daele DJ, Luschei ES. Quantitative contributions of the muscles of the tongue, floor-of-mouth, jaw, and velum to tongue-to-palate pressure generation. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2008;514:828-35.

16. Silverdale MA, Schneider AS, Bhathia KP, Lang AE. The spectrum of orolingual tremor - a proposed classification system. Mov Disord. 2008;232:159-67.

17. Hunker CJ, Abbs JH. Uniform frequency of parkinsonian resting tremor in the lips, jaw, tongue, and index finger. Mov Disord. 1990;51:71-7.

18. Adams V, Mathisen B, Baines S, Lazarus C, Callister R. A systematic review and meta-analysis of measurements of tongue and hand strength and endurance using the Iowa Oral Performance Instrument (IOPI). Dysphagia. 2013;283:350-69.

19. Clark HM, Henson PA, Barber WD, Stierwalt JAG, Sherrill M. Relationships among subjective and objective measures of the tongue strength and oral phase swallowing impairments. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2003;12:40-50.


Submetido em:
03/04/2016

Aceito em:
20/04/2016

6a1def8da9539526d97e3bb3 cefac Articles

Revista CEFAC

Share this page
Page Sections