Speech sound disorder interventions approach in Brazil: A scoping review
Abordagens terapêuticas do transtorno fonológico no Brasil: uma revisão de escopo
Jesus Cláudio Gabana-Silveira; Carolina Lisbôa Mezzomo; Helena Bolli Mota
Abstract
Keywords
Resumo
Objetivo: verificar quais são as abordagens terapêuticas para o transtorno fonológico mais publicadas nas principais revistas de Fonoaudiologia brasileiras em crianças falantes monolíngues do português brasileiro nos últimos 10 anos (2014-2024).
Métodos: pesquisa de artigos científicos em língua inglesa e/ou portuguesa, publicados entre os anos de 2014 a 2024, nas quatro principais revistas de Fonoaudiologia brasileira: CoDAS, CEFAC, ACR e Distúrbios da Comunicação. Os termos pesquisados foram: desvio fonológico/transtorno fonológico/distúrbio fonológico AND terapia OR intervenção.
Revisão da Literatura: foram selecionados 20 artigos dos 78 rastreados. Destes, 50% foram publicados na Rev. CEFAC; 80% publicados há mais de seis anos, 75% são artigos de pesquisas realizadas na Universidade Federal de Santa Maria. As pesquisas tiveram em média seis participantes, com idade média de 5:7.
Conclusão: as abordagens terapêuticas mais publicadas nas revistas pesquisadas foram: pares mínimos, ABAB-Retirada e provas múltiplas, consciência fonológica e ciclos modificado. Todas as abordagens terapêuticas fonológicas utilizadas foram eficazes na superação do transtorno fonológico, conforme os autores que as estudaram.
Palavras-chave
References
1. Ceron MI, Simoni SN, Urrutia GAU, Keske-Soares M. Segmental acquisition of Brazilian Portuguese: Onset simple, complex and coda. CoDAS. 2022;34(3):e20200439.
2. Ribas LP, Faleiro A, Sartori Bernardi AC, Cerutti Lemmertz ML. Phonological acquisition of Brazilian Portuguese: A systematic review about the consonantal development. Distúrb. Comunic. 2022;34(1):e53900.
3. Ceron MI, Bonini JB, Keske-Soares M. Therapeutic progress on subjects submitted to phonological therapy using the multiple oppositions approach. Rev. CEFAC. 2015;17(3):965-73.
4. Speech-language-therapy.com [Webpage on the internet]. Bowen C. The speech sound disorders umbrella with plain English labels [accessed on 2025 jun 13]. Available at:
5. Shriberg LD, Kwiatkowski J, Mabie HL. Estimates of the prevalence of motor speech disorders in children with idiopathic speech delay. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics. 2019;33:679-706.
6. Dias RF, Mezzomo CL. Speech therapy for phonological disorders with basis on stimulation of phonological awareness skills. Distúrb. Comunic. 2016 [Journal on the internet]; 28(1):14-26. [accessed on 2025 jun 23]. Available at:
7. Andrade CRF de. Prevalência das desordens idiopáticas da fala e da linguagem em crianças de um a onze anos de idade. Rev. Saúde Pública. 1997;31(5):495-501.
8. Longo IA, Tupinelli GG, Hermógenes C, Ferreira LV, Molini-Avejonas DR. Prevalence of speech and language disorders in children in the western region of São Paulo. CoDAS. 2017;29(6):e20160036.
9. César A de M, Maksud SS. Caracterização da demanda de fonoaudiologia no serviço público municipal de Ribeirão das Neves - MG. Rev. CEFAC. 2007;9(1):133-8.
10. Diniz RD, Bordin R. Demanda em Fonoaudiologia em um serviço público municipal da região sul do Brasil. Rev. soc. bras. fonoaudiol. 2011;16(2):126-31.
11. Farias IKM de S, Araújo ANB de, Nascimento CMB do, Xavier IA de LN, Vilela MBR. Characterization of care provided at a Speech Therapy School Clinic affiliated with the Brazilian public healthcare system. Rev. CEFAC. 2020;22(1):e10119.
12. Molini-Avejonas DR, Estevam SF, Couto MIV. Organization of the referral and counter-referral system in a speech-language pathology and audiology clinic-school. CoDAS. 2015;27(3):273-8.
13. Rabelo ATV, Campos FR, Friche CP, Silva BSV da, Friche AA de L, Alves CRL et al. Speech and language disorders in children from public schools in Belo Horizonte. Rev Paul Pediatr. 2015;33(4):453-9.
14. Ceron MI, Gubiani MB, Oliveira CR de, Gubiani MB, Keske-Soares M. Prevalence of phonological disorders and phonological processes in typical and atypical phonological development. CoDAS. 2017;29(3):e20150306.
15. Angst OVM, Liberalesso KP, Wiethan FM, Mota HB. Prevalence of speech-language disorders in kindergarten children of public schools and the social indicators. Rev. CEFAC. 2015;17(3):727-33.
16. Goulart BNG de, Chiari BM. Speech disorders and grade retention in elementary. Rev. CEFAC. 2014;16(3):810-6.
17. Baker E, Williams AL, McLeod S, McCauley R. Elements of phonological interventions for children with speech sound disorders: The development of a taxonomy. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2018;27(3):906-35.
18. Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, O'Brien KK, Colquhoun H, Levac D et al. PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med. 2018;169:467-73.
19. Golembiouski F, Czlusniak GR, Dassie-Leite AP, Oliveira JP de, Bagarollo MF. Characterization and follow-up of children with phonological disorder. Rev. CEFAC. 2014;16(1):318-27.
20. Silva TF da, Ribeiro GCF, Silva CEE da, Assis MF de, Dezani H, Berti LC. Efficacy in the use of gamification strategy in phonological therapy. CoDAS. 2023;35(6):e20220181.
21. Luna AC, Silva LAF, Barrozo TF, Leite RA, Wertzner HF, Matas CG. Neuronal plasticity of the auditory pathway in children with speech sound disorder: A study of long-latency auditory evoked potentials. CoDAS. 2021;33(4):e20200145.
22. Marchetti PT, Dalcin LM, Balen SA, Mezzomo CL. Comparison between isolated phonological therapy and when associated to computerized auditory training in the rehabilitation of phonological disorders in children. Distúrb. Comunic. 2021;33(3):545-56.
23. Noblat LRM, Silva MFF, Cunha MC. Interactional technology tools in tablets phonological intervention in children with speech disorders. Distúrb. Comunic. 2020;32(1):41-51.
24. Bonini JB, Keske-Soares M. Pseudowords to the phonological therapy: A new therapeutic approach. CoDAS. 2018;30(6):e20170014.
25. Dias RF, Mezzomo CL. Effects of stimulating abilities on phonological awareness in the reorganization of the phonological system: Case report. Distúrb. Comunic. 2018;30(2):266-77.
26. Sotero LKB, Pagliarin KC. The use of software in cases of speech sound disorders. CoDAS. 2018;30(6):e20180008.
27. Cavalheiro MG, Corrêa CDC, Berretin-Felix G, Maximino LP. Interchange of ankyloglossia for the evolution of the phonological framework: Clinical case. Distúrb. Comunic. 2018;30(4):785-90.
28. Brancalioni AR, Keske-Soares M. Phonological disorders treatment effect with a stimulability and segment complexity strata model with speech intervention software (SIFALA). Rev. CEFAC. 2016;18(1):298-308.
29. Wiethan FM, Mota HB. The influence of the choice of target sounds and therapy model in children who present devoicing. Rev. CEFAC. 2015;17(Suppl 1):126-34.
30. Giacchini V, Mota HB, Mezzomo CL. The details in the therapeutic process to the consonant clusters acquisition in the speech of children with phonological disorder. Rev. CEFAC. 2015;17(Suppl 1):17-26.
31. Barberena L da S, Mota HB, Keske-Soares M. Phonological changes obtained by treatment based on ABAB-Withdrawal and Multiple-Probes Approach in different severity levels of phonological disorders. Rev. CEFAC. 2015;17(Suppl 1):44-51.
32. Gubiani MB, Keske-Soares M. Structural generalization by children with speech-sound disorders under different therapeutic approaches. Rev. CEFAC. 2014;16(6):1842-9.
33. Wiethan FM, Mota HB. The generalization through the treatment with fricatives: Favorable environments versus unfavorable and neutral environments. Rev. CEFAC. 2014;16(3):1021-9.
34. Gubiani MB, Keske-Soares M. Phonological evolution of children with speech disorders submitted to different therapeutic approaches. Rev. CEFAC. 2014;16(2):663-71.
35. Mezzomo CL, Mota HB, Keske-Soares M, Ceron MI, Dias RF. The influence of phonological awareness abilities in therapy for phonological disorder. Rev. CEFAC. 2014;16(1):328-35.
36. Bonini JB, Bertagnolli APC, Freitas GP, Blanco-Dutra AP, Keske-Soares M. Eficácia de palavras favorecedoras com a fricativa /?/ na terapia fonológica. Distúrb. Comunic. 2014 [Journal on the internet]; 26(2):395-404. [accessed on 2025 jul 23]. Available at:
37. Storkel HL. The complexity approach to phonological treatment: How to select treatment targets. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2018;49(3):463-81.
38. Watts E, Rose Y. Markedness and implicational relationships in phonological development: A cross-linguistic investigation. Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2020;22(6):669-82.
39. Combiths P, Escobedo A, Barlow JA, Pruitt-Lord S. Complexity and cross-linguistic transfer in intervention for Spanish-English bilingual children with speech sound disorder. J Monolingual Biling Speech. 2022;4(3):234-70.
Submitted date:
07/25/2024
Accepted date:
05/25/2025
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Mendeley
Email