Revista CEFAC
https://revistacefac.org.br/article/doi/10.1590/1982-0216/20232546623
Revista CEFAC
Original Articles

Vocal rehabilitation in singers with vocal complaints: a digital kymography analysis

Reabilitação vocal em cantoras com queixa vocal:  análise da videoquimografia digital

Ualisson Nogueira do Nascimento; Marco Aurélio Rocha Santos; Ana Cristina Côrtes Gama

http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1982-0216/20232546623 Revista CEFAC, vol.25, n4, e6623, 2023
PDF English
PDF Português
Downloads: 0
Views: 109

Abstract

Purpose: to evaluate the effects of the Comprehensive Vocal Rehabilitation Program associated with the application of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation through digital kymography in singers with vocal complaints.

Methods: an experimental intrasubject comparative study in 24 singers, who underwent the rehabilitation program associated with transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation. They were assessed with laryngeal high-speed videoendoscopy before and after vocal rehabilitation. The paired t-test and Wilcoxon test were used to compare the two assessments. The significance level was set at 5%.

Results: significant differences were found in the maximum opening, dominant amplitude of the opening variation and dominant frequency of the opening variation of the right vocal fold in the posterior glottic region, and in maximum opening, mean opening, dominant amplitude of the opening variation of the left vocal fold and dominant frequency of the opening variation of both vocal folds in the anterior glottic region.

Conclusion: the results showed that the Comprehensive Vocal Rehabilitation Program associated with transcutaneous electrical stimulation decreased the opening amplitude of the vocal fold, increased the vibration frequency, and improved glottal closure in the anterior and posterior glottic regions.

 

Keywords

Voice; Voice Disorders; Voice Training; Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation; Laryngoscopy; Kymography

Resumo

Objetivo: avaliar os efeitos do Programa Integral de Reabilitação Vocal associado à aplicação da estimulação elétrica nervosa transcutânea por meio da videoquimografia digital em cantoras com queixa vocal. 

Métodos: estudo experimental comparativo intrassujeitos com 24 cantoras, que realizaram o programa de reabilitação associado à estimulação elétrica nervosa transcutânea. A avaliação, por meio da videolaringoscopia de alta velocidade, foi realizada antes e após a reabilitação vocal. Os testes T pareado e de Wilcoxon foram utilizados para comparação das duas avaliações. Considerou-se o nível de significância de 5%. 

Resultados: diferenças significantes foram identificadas quanto aos parâmetros de abertura máxima, amplitude dominante de variação de abertura e frequência dominante de abertura da prega vocal direita na região posterior da glote, além dos parâmetros de abertura máxima, abertura média, amplitude dominante de variação de abertura da prega vocal esquerda e frequência dominante de abertura de ambas as pregas vocais na região anterior da glote. 

Conclusão: os resultados mostraram que o Programa Integral de Reabilitação Vocal associado à estimulação elétrica transcutânea promoveu uma diminuição da amplitude de abertura da prega vocal e aumento da frequência de vibração, além de um melhor fechamento glótico nas regiões anterior e posterior da glote. 

Palavras-chave

Voz; Distúrbios da Voz; Treinamento da Voz; Estimulação Elétrica Nervosa Transcutânea; Laringoscopia; Quimografia

Referencias

1. Zacharias SRC, Deliyski DD, Gerlach TT. Utility of laryngeal high-speed videoendoscopy in Clinical Voice Assessment. J Voice. 2018;32(2):216-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2017.05.002 PMID: 28596101.

2. Parker LA, Kunduk M, Fink DS, McWhorter A. Reliability of high-speed videoendoscopic ratings of essential voice tremor and adductor spasmodic dysphonia. J Voice. 2019;33(1):16-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2017.10.009 PMID: 29246397.

3. Deliyski DD, Powell MEG, Zacharias SRC, Gerlach TT, de Alarcon A. Experimental investigation on minimum frame rate requirements of high-speed videoendoscopy for Clinical Voice Assessment. Biomed Signal Process Control. 2015;17:21-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bspc.2014.11.007 PMID: 28989342.

4. Patel R, Dailey S, Bless D. Comparison of high-speed digital imaging with stroboscopy for laryngeal imaging of Glottal Disorders. Ann Oto Rhinol Laryngol. 2008;117(6):413-24. https://doi.org/10.1177/000348940811700603 PMID: 18646437.

5. Mendelsohn AH, Remacle M, Courey MS, Gerhard F, Postma GN. The diagnostic role of high-speed vocal fold vibratory imaging. J Voice. 2013;27(5):627-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2013.04.011 PMID: 23911007.

6. Svec J, Schutte H. Kymographic imaging of laryngeal vibrations. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012;20(6):458-65. https://doi.org/10.1097/moo.0b013e3283581feb PMID: 22931907.

7. Lee J, Wang S, Sung E, Bae I, Kim S, Lee Y. Clinical practicability of a newly developed real-time digital kymographic system. J Voice. 2019;33(3):346-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2017.10.024

8. Zita A, Novozamský A, Zitová B, Šorel M, Herbst CT, Vydrová J et al. Videokymogram analyzer tool: Human-computer comparison. Biomed Signal Process Control. 2022;78:103878. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bspc.2022.103878

9. Krausert CR, Olszewski AE, Taylor LN, McMurray JS, Dailey SH, Jiang JJ. Mucosal wave measurement and visualization techniques. J Voice. 2011;25(4):395-405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2010.02.001 PMID: 20471798.

10. Yamauchi A, Yokonishi H, Imagawa H, Sakakibara K, Nito T, Tayama N et al. Quantitative analysis of digital videokymography: a preliminary study on age- and gender-related difference of vocal fold vibration in normal speakers. J Voice. 2015;29(1):109-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2014.05.006 PMID: 25228432.

11. Phadke K, Vydrová J, Domagalská R, Švec J. Evaluation of clinical value of videokymography for diagnosis and treatment of voice disorders. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2017;274(11):3941-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-017-4726-1 PMID: 28856469.

12. Franco RA, Andrus JG. Common diagnoses and treatments in professional voice users. Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America. 2007;40(5):1025-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otc.2007.05.008 PMID: 17765694.

13. Pestana PM, Vaz-Freitas S, Manso MC. Prevalence of voice disorders in singers: Systematic review and meta-analysis. J Voice. 2017;31(6):722-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2017.02.010 PMID: 28342677.

14. Mathmann P, Konerding U, Deuster D, Neumann K. The influence of age, gender, health-related behaviors, and other factors on occupationally relevant health complaints of singers. J Voice. 2021;S0892-1997(21):00251-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2021.08.001 PMID: 34583882.

15. Behlau M, Almeida AA, Amorim G, Balata P, Bastos S, Cassol M et al. Reducing the gap between science and clinic: Lessons from academia and professional practice - part B: Traditional vocal therapy techniques and modern electrostimulation and photobiomodulation techniques applied to vocal rehabilitation. CoDAS. 2022;34(5):e20210240. https://doi.org/10.1590/2317-1782/20212021241pt PMID: 36000681.

16. Adessa M, Stadelman-Cohen T, Zipse L, Guarino A, Heaton J. Factors affecting voice therapy completion in singers. J Voice. 2018;32(5):564-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2017.06.021 PMID: 28797530.

17. Behlau M, Gama A, Cielo C. Técnicas vocais. In: Marquesan I, Silva H, Tome M, editors. Tratado das Especialidades em Fonoaudiologia. São Paulo: Roca; 2014. p.127-52.

18. Behlau M, Pontes P, Vieira V, Yamasaki R, Madazio G. Presentation of the Comprehensive Vocal Rehabilitation Program for the treatment of behavioral dysphonia. CoDAS. 2013;25(5):492-6. https://doi.org/10.1590/s2317-17822013000500015 PMID: 24408556.

19. Pedrosa V, Pontes A, Pontes P, Behlau M, Peccin S. The Effectiveness of the Comprehensive Voice Rehabilitation Program compared with the vocal function exercises method in behavioral dysphonia: a randomized clinical trial. J Voice. 2016;30(3):377.e11-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2015.03.013 PMID: 25959424.

20. Cavalcanti N, Souza B, Gama A, Medeiros A. Effect of the comprehensive voice rehabilitation program in teachers with behavioral dysphonia. CoDAS. 2018;30(4):e20170182. https://doi.org/10.1590/2317-1782/20182017182 PMID: 30088521.

21. Santos J, Silvério K, Diniz Oliveira N, Gama A. Evaluation of electrostimulation effect in women with vocal nodules. J Voice. 2016;30(6):769.e1-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2015.10.023 PMID: 26822388.

22. Mansuri B, Torabinezhad F, Jamshidi A, Dabirmoghadam P, Vasaghi-Gharamaleki B, Ghelichi L. Application of high-frequency transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in muscle tension dysphonia patients with the pain complaint: the immediate effect. J Voice. 2020;34(5):657-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2019.02.009 PMID: 31078355.

23. Siqueira L, Ribeiro V, Moreira P, Brasolotto A, de Jesus Guirro R, Alves Silverio K. Effects of transcutaneous electrical nervous stimulation (TENS) associated with vocal therapy on musculoskeletal pain of women with behavioral dysphonia: a randomized, placebo-controlled double-blind clinical trial. J Commun Disord. 2019;82:105923. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcomdis.2019.105923 PMID: 31382210.

24. Silverio K, Brasolotto A, Siqueira L, Carneiro C, Fukushiro A, Guirro R. Effect of Application of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation and laryngeal manual therapy in dysphonic women: clinical trial. J Voice. 2015;29(2):200-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2014.06.003 PMID: 25439510.

25. Almeida A, Cunha D, Duarte B, Guimarães B, Lucena J, Pernambuco L et al. Effect of vocal therapy associated with TENS in women with behavioral dysphonia. J Voice. 2022;36(4):585.e27-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2020.07.035 PMID: 32863100.

26. Conde M, Siqueira L, Vendramini J, Brasolotto A, Guirro R, Silverio K. Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) and Laryngeal Manual Therapy (LMT): immediate effects in women with dysphonia. J Voice. 2018;32(3):385.e17-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2017.04.019 PMID: 28533075.

27. Nogueira do Nascimento U, Santos M, Gama A. Analysis of the immediate effects of the LaxVox technique on digital videokymography parameters in adults with voice complaints. J Voice. 2022;S0892-1997(22):00026-1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2022.01.026 PMID: 35256223.

28. Plec EMRL, Côrtes Gama AC, Souza BO, Santos MAR. Effect of nebulization on laryngeal parameters: analysis using high-speed digital videolaryngoscopy. J Voice. 2022;S0892-1997(22):00014-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2022.01.014 PMID: 35288013.

29. Whyte J, Barrett AM. Advancing the evidence base of rehabilitation treatments: a developmental approach. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012;93(8 Suppl):S101-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2011.11.040 PMID: 22683206.

30. Electrophysical Agents - Contraindications and precautions: an evidence-based approach to clinical decision making in physical therapy. Physiother Can. 2010;62(5):1-80. https://doi.org/10.3138/ptc.62.5 PMID: 21886384

31. Woo P. Stroboscopy. San Diego: Plural Publishing; 2009.

32. KayPENTAX. Instruction manual. Color High-Speed Video System and Components Model 9710. Montvale, NJ. 2011.

33. Koo TK, Li MY. A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J Chiropr Med. 2016;15(4):155-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012 PMID: 27330520.

34. Kwok M, Eslick G. The impact of vocal and laryngeal pathologies among professional singers: a meta-analysis. J Voice. 2019;33(1):58-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2017.09.002 PMID: 29523383.

35. Kendall KA, Leonard RJ. Laryngeal evaluation: indirect laryngoscopy to high-speed digital imaging. New York: Thieme Medical Publishers; 2010.

36. Azevedo LL, Passaglio KT, Rosseti MB, Silva CB, Oliveira BFV, Costa RC. Avaliação da performance vocal antes e após a vibração sonorizada de língua. Rev Soc Bras Fonoaudiol. 2010;15(3):343-8.

37. Fabron E, Petrini A, Cardoso V, Batista J, Motonaga S, Marino V. Immediate effects of tongue trills associated with transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS). CoDAS. 2017;29(3):e20150311. https://doi.org/10.1590/2317-1782/20172015311 PMID: 28614457.

38. Zhang Z. Mechanics of human voice production and control. J Acoust Soc Am. 2016;140(4):2614. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4964509 PMID: 27794319.

39. Deliyski DD, Powell ME, Zacharias SR, Gerlach TT, de Alarcon A. Experimental investigation on minimum frame rate requirements of high-speed videoendoscopy for clinical voice assessment. Biomed Signal Process Control. 2015;17:21-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bspc.2014.11.007 PMID: 28989342.

40. Schlegel P, Kunduk M, Stingl M, Semmler M, Döllinger M, Bohr C et al. Influence of spatial camera resolution in high-speed videoendoscopy on laryngeal parameters. PLoS One. 2019;14(4):e0215168. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215168 PMID: 31009488.
 

Submitted date:
03/07/2023

Accepted date:
16/10/2023

65bcfd58a953951823583b24 cefac Articles
Links & Downloads
1982-0216 (Electrónico) 1516-1846 (Impreso)
Revista CEFAC ©2024 Todos los derechos reservados.

Revista CEFAC

Share this page
Page Sections