Revista CEFAC
https://revistacefac.org.br/article/doi/10.1590/1982-0216/20222459022
Revista CEFAC
Original Articles

Influence of different aspects on psychoacoustic measurements of patients with chronic tinnitus

Influência de diferentes aspectos nas medidas psicoacústicas de pacientes com zumbido crônico

Larissa Yasmine de Lima; Adriane Ribeiro Teixeira; Letícia Petersen Schmidt Rosito; Alexandre Hundertmarck Lessa

Downloads: 0
Views: 401

Abstract

Purpose:  to verify the sex, age, tinnitus location, presence or absence of hearing loss, its degree, and the psychoacoustic measurements (pitch, loudness, minimum masking level [MML], and residual inhibition [RI]) of patients with chronic tinnitus and their relationships.

Methods:  the study included subjects of both sexes, aged 25 to 85 years, with complaints of chronic tinnitus, followed up at the health service where the research was conducted. They were submitted to medical history survey, basic audiological assessment, and pitch, loudness, RI, and MML research. The following statistical tests were used: chi-square test, Fisher’s exact test, Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney U test, Kruskal-Wallis test, and Spearman’s correlation coefficient. The significance level was set at 5% (p≤0.05).

Results:  the type of tinnitus was associated with the presence or absence of hearing loss (HL), degree of HL, MML, and loudness; age was associated with the presence or absence of HL and its degree. There was a directly weak proportional correlation between loudness and MML, whereas the correlations between pitch and loudness, pitch and MML, and RI and MML were weak and inversely proportional.

Conclusion:  both the affected subjects and their tinnitus characteristics were heterogeneous. The results indicate that some variables influence one another, which also happens between psychoacoustic measurements.

Keywords

Hearing; Psychoacoustics; Tinnitus

Resumo

Objetivo:  verificar o gênero, a idade, a localização do zumbido, a presença ou ausência de perda auditiva e seu grau, assim como as medidas psicoacústicas (pitch, loudness, nível mínimo de mascaramento e inibição residual) de pacientes com zumbido crônico e as suas relações.

Métodos:  o estudo incluiu sujeitos de ambos os gêneros, com idades entre 25 e 85 anos, com queixa de zumbido crônico e que realizassem acompanhamento em ambulatório especializado do Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre. Foram submetidos a anamnese, avaliação audiológica básica, pesquisa de pitch, loudness, inibição residual (IR) e nível mínimo de mascaramento (NMM). Foram utilizados os seguintes testes estatísticos: Teste Qui-Quadrado, Teste Exato de Fisher, Teste U de Wilcoxon - Mann-Whitney, Teste Kruskal Wallis e Coeficiente de Correlação de Spearman. O nível de significância utilizado foi de 5% (p≤0,05).

Resultados:  houve associação entre a variável tipo de zumbido e presença ou ausência de perda auditiva (PA), grau de PA, NMM e loudness, assim como, entre idade e presença ou ausência de PA e seu grau. A loudness e o NMM apresentaram fraca correlação diretamente proporcional, ao passo que as correlações entre pitch e loudnesspitch e NMM e IR versus NMM apresentaram-se fracas e inversamente proporcionais.

Conclusão:  houve heterogeneidade entre as características do zumbido e dos indivíduos acometidos. Conclui-se, de acordo com os resultados expostos, que existe influência de algumas variáveis entre si, da mesma maneira que ocorre entre as medidas psicoacústicas.

Palavras-chave

Audição; Psicoacústica; Zumbido

Referencias

1. Kim DK, Ahn SY, Gwak J, Park JH, Kim JY, Park SN. Clinical and psychoacoustic characteristics of tinnitus in patients with normal hearing. J Audiol Otol. 2015;19(1):15-20.

2. Fernandes AF, Pinheiro MMC. Estudo das queixas auditivas e medidas psicoacústicas de indivíduos com zumbido. Rev. CEFAC. 2011;13(4):645-51.

3. Sereda M, Hoare DJ, Hall DA. Assessment of tinnitus: a review of psychoacoustic measures and self-report questionnaires. In: Tyler RS, editor. Tinnitus handbook. San Diego: Plural Publishing; 2014. p. 41-76.

4. Baguley DM, McFerran D. Tinnitus. In: Graham JM, Scadding GK, Bull PD, editors. Pediatric ENT. Berlin: Springer; 2007. p. 309-17.

5. Moller AR. Tinnitus: presence and future. In: Tyler RS, editor. Tinnitus handbook. San Diego: Plural Publishing; 2000. p. 1-16.

6. Henry JA, Zaugg TL, Schechter MA. Clinical guide for audiologic tinnitus management. I. Assessment. Am J Audiol. 2005;14(1):21-48.

7. Knobel KAB, Sanchez TG. Influência da audição na percepção do zumbido e da hiperacusia. Rev. Bras. Otorrinolaringol. 2005;71(4):463-70.

8. Branco TCA, Branco RCA, Branco RCA. Zumbido: a percepção do paciente e as medidas psicoacústicas. Rev. CEFAC. 2013;15(1):31-8.

9. Hallam RS, Jakes SC, Hinchcliffe R. Cognitive variables in tinnitus annoyance. Br J Clin Psychol. 1988;27(3):213-22.

10. Tyler RS, Baker LJ. Difficulties experienced by tinnitus sufferers. J Speech Hear Disord. 1983;48(2):150-4.

11. Schmidt LP, Teixeira AR, Dall'igna C, Dall'agnol L, Smith MM. Psychoacoustic measurements of tinnitus: a comparison of methods. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2014;80(1):41-6.

12. Henry JA, Meikle MB. Psychoacoustic measures of tinnitus. J Am Acad Audiol. 2000;11(3):138-55.

13. Jakes SC, Hallam RS, Chambers C, Hinchcliffe R. A factor analytical study of tinnitus complaint. J Psychosom Res. 1985;29(5):521-30.

14. Newman CW, Jacobson GP, Spitzer JB. Development of the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1996;122(2):143-8.

15. Paula GPR, Onishi ET, Fukuda Y, Paula Junior GPR. Psychoacoustic measurements of tinnitus and its relationship with Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI). Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2007;73(2):187-94.

16. Sanches SGG, Samelli AG, Nishiyama AK, Sanchez TG, Carvallo RMM. Psychoacoustic measurements of tinnitus: a study on the relationship with audiological characteristics. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2016;82(6):634-40.

17. Hall JW, Mueller HG. Audiologists' desk reference: diagnostic audiology and habilitation/rehabilitation issues. San Diego: Singular Publishing Group; 1997.

18. Ferreira PEA, Cunha F, Onishi ET, Ganança FF, Mendes Neto AS. Tinnitus Handicap Inventory: cultural adaptation and validation to Brazilian Portuguese. Pró-Fono R. Atual. Cient. 2005;17(3):303-10.

19. Henry JA, Meikle MB. Psychoacoustic measures of tinnitus. J Am Acad Audiol. 2000;11(3):138-55.

20. Henry JA, Roberts LE, Caspary DM, Theodoroff SM, Salvi RJ. Underlying mechanisms of tinnitus. Ear hear. 2013;34(5):661-72.

21. Benin L, Teixeira AT, Lessa AH, Rosito LPS, Walbrohel I, Picinini T et al. Zumbido crônico: estudo em indivíduos com e sem perda auditiva. ConScientiae Saúde. 2016;15(4):657-64.

22. Neves CZ, Otavio AC da C, Rosito LPS, Lessa AH, Teixeira AR, Dall'igna C. Caracterização do zumbido por idosos atendidos em ambulatório especializado em hospital universitário de Porto Alegre. In: Blessmann EJ, Gonçalves AK, editors. Envelhecimento: equilíbrio, cognição, audição e qualidade de vida. Porto Alegre: NEIE/UFRGS, 2015. p.133-49.

23. Neves, CZ, Rosito LPS, Santos JPNA, Teixeira AR. Self-perception of tinnitus: study before and after adaptation of hearing aids. Audiol., Commun. Res. 2020:25:e2325.

24. Oosterloo BC, Croll PH, Jong RJB, Ikram MK, Goedegebure A. Prevalence of tinnitus in an aging population and its relation to age and hearing loss. Otolaryngol. Head Neck surg. 2021;164(4):859-68.

25. Urnau D, Tochetto TM. Características do zumbido e da hiperacusia em indivíduos normo-ouvintes. Arq. int. otorrinolaringol. 2011;15(4):468-74.

26. Savastano M. Tinnitus with or without hearing loss: are its characteristics different? Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2008;265(11):1295-300.

27. Samelli AG, Sanches SGG, Chammas CM. Psychoacoustic attributes of tinnitus and its relationship with audiological characteristics. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2016;82(6):634-40.

28. Hiller W, Goebel G. Factors influencing self-rated changes in tinnitus severity. J Psychosom Res. 2006;60(1):55-63.

29. Searchfield GD. Hearing aids and tinnitus. In: Tyler RS, editor. Tinnitus handbook. San Diego: Plural Publishing; 2000. p. 1-16.

30. Shekhawat GS, Searchfield GD, Stinear CM. The role of hearing aids in tinnitus management: a review. J Am Acad Audiol. 2013;24(8):747-62.

31. Schecklmann M, Vielsmeier V, Steffens T, Landgrebe M, Langguth B. Relationship between audiometric slope and tinnitus pitch in tinnitus patients with hearing loss. PLoS One. 2012;7(4):e34878.

32. Rabau S, Cox T, Punte AK, Van de Heyning P, Gillespie A. Changes over time of psychoacoustic characteristics in tinnitus patients. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2015;272(11):3273-81.


Submitted date:
13/09/2022

Accepted date:
01/11/2022

6a075377a953954e722206d8 cefac Articles

Revista CEFAC

Share this page
Page Sections