Revista CEFAC
https://revistacefac.org.br/article/doi/10.1590/1982-0216/20222436521
Revista CEFAC
Artigos Originais

Relationships between chronological and linguistic age and phonological awareness in children with developmental language disorder

Relações entre idade linguística e consciência fonológica de crianças com transtorno do desenvolvimento da linguagem

Debora Maria Befi-Lopes; Letícia Farias de Azevedo Leão; Aparecido José Couto Soares

Downloads: 0
Views: 148

Abstract

Purpose: to verify whether there is a relation between linguistic age and performance in phonological awareness of children presented with developmental language disorder.

Methods: a retrospective study comprising 53 children with developmental language disorder aged between 4 and 7 years old. Their language disorder diagnosis followed the inclusion criteria internationally described and Brazilian standardized tests for language assessment were used. All children underwent phonological awareness and linguistic skills assessment via standardized tests and all data went through statistical analysis. For correlation analysis, the p-value was performed through the Pearson’s test. In the regression analysis the models used expressive and receptive linguistic age as independent variables and the performance in phonological awareness as a dependent variable (p=0,036* and p= 0,048*).

Results: the data indicated a strong correlation between language age and phonological awareness skills in children with language developmental disorder. A strong correlation between syllabic awareness and linguistic age was found as well. In addition, phonemic awareness was correlated to their chronological age. All correlation tests were confirmed by regression analysis.

Conclusion: the data indicated a strong correlation between linguistic age and phonological awareness in children with developmental language disorders. These findings raise discussion regarding phonemic skills in children under this condition and their literacy process.

Keywords

Evaluation, Language, Child, Specific Language Disorder, Language Tests

Resumo

Objetivo: verificar se há relações entre a idade linguística e consciência fonológica em crianças com transtorno do desenvolvimento de linguagem.

Métodos: estudo retrospectivo. Foram sujeitos 53 crianças com transtorno do desenvolvimento da linguagem com idade entre 4 e 7 anos. O diagnóstico seguiu critérios de inclusão descritos internacionalmente. Todas as crianças passaram por avaliação da consciência fonológica e avaliação de linguagem por meio de testes específicos. Os dados passaram por análise estatística. A análise de correlação foi realizada utilizando o teste de correlação de Pearson. Na análise de regressão, os modelos tiveram a idade linguística expressiva e receptiva como variáveis independentes e o desempenho em consciência fonológica como variável dependente. O valor de significância estatística adotado foi igual a 5% (p ≤ 0,05).

Resultados: os dados indicaram forte relação entre idade linguística e habilidades de consciência fonológica. Observou-se, ainda, forte correlação entre consciência silábica e idade linguística. Além disso, a consciência fonêmica mostrou-se correlacionada com a idade cronológica. Todas as correlações foram confirmadas por meio de uma análise de regressão.

Conclusão: os dados indicaram forte correlação entre a idade linguística e as habilidades de consciência fonológica em crianças com transtorno do desenvolvimento da linguagem. Ademais, mostraram evidências de que essa correlação existe tanto para idade linguística expressiva quanto receptiva apenas quanto às habilidades silábicas.

Palavras-chave

Avaliação; Linguagem; Criança; Transtorno Específico de Linguagem; Testes de Linguagem

Referências

1. Bishop DVM, Adams C. A prospective study of the relationship between specific language impairment, phonological disorders and reading retardation. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 1990;31(7):1027-50.

2. Bishop DVM, Snowling MJ, Thompson PA, Greenhalgh T, Adams C, Archibald L et al. Phase 2 of CATALISE: a multinational and multidisciplinary Delphi consensus study of problems with language development: Terminology. J Child Psychol Psychiatry Allied Discip. 2017;58(10):1068-80.

3. Fortunato-Tavares T, Rocha CN, de Andrade CRF, Befi-Lopes DM, Schochat E, Hestvik A et al. Processamento linguístico e processamento auditivo temporal em crianças com distúrbio específico de linguagem. Pro-Fono R. Atualiz. Cientif. 2009;21(4):279-84.

4. Befi-Lopes DM, Cáceres AM, Esteves L. Linguistic profile of children with language impairment. Rev Soc Bras Fonoaudiol. 2012;17(2):274-8.

5. Broc L, Joye N, Dockrell JE, Olive T. Capturing the nature of spellind errors in Developmental Language Disorder: a scoping review. Lang Speech Hear Serv in Schools. 2021;52(4):1127-40

6. Godin MP, Gagné A, Chapleau N. Spelling acquisition in French children with developmental language disorder: An analysis of spelling error patterns. Child Lang Teach Ther. 2018;34(3):221-33.

7. Snowling MJ, Moll K, Hulme C. Language difficulties are a shared risk factor both for reading and mathematics disorder. J Exp Child Psyshol. 2021;202(2021):1-12.

8. Snowling MJ, Duff FJ, Nash HM, Hulme C. Language profiles and literacy outcomes of children with resolving, emerging, or persisting language impairments. J Child Psychol Psychiatry Allied Discip. 2016;57(12):1360-9.

9. Rudolph JM, Leonard LB. Early language milestones and specific language impairment. J Early Interv. 2016;38(1):41-58.

10. Pedott PR, Cáceres-Assenço AM, Befi-Lopes DM. Alliteration and rhyme skills in children with specific language impairment. CoDAS. 2017;29(2):e20160017.

11. Delage H, Durrleman S. Developmental dyslexia and specific language impairment: Distinct syntactic profiles? Clin Lingu Phonetics. 2018;32(8):758-85.

12. Kouri TA. Phonogram and word decoding patterns in children with developmental language disorders: Evidence for protracted periods of graphophonemic decoding. J Commun Disord. 2020;84:1-15.

13. Lauterbach AA, Park Y, Lombardino LJ. The roles of cognitive and language abilities in predicting decoding and reading comprehension: comparisons of dyslexia and specific language impairment. Ann Dyslexia. 2017;67(3):201-18.

14. Soares AJC, Cárnio MS. Phonemic awareness in students before and after language workshops. J Soc Bras Fonoaudiol. 2012;24(1):69-75.

15. Chen H, Myhill D. Children talking about writing: Investigating metalinguistic understanding. Linguist Edu. 2016;35(2016):100-8.

16. Graham S, Hebert M, Fishman E, Ray AB, Rouse AG. Do children classified with specific language impairment have a learning disability in writing? A meta-analysis. J Learn Disabil. 2020;53(4):292-310

17. Catts HW, Fey ME, Tomblin JB, Zhang X. A longitudinal investigation of children with language impairments. J Speech, Lang Hear Res. 2002;45(6):1142-57.

18. Conti-Ramsden G, Mok PLH, Pickles A, Durkin K. Adolescents with a history of specific language impairment (SLI): strengths and difficulties in social, emotional and behavioral functioning. Res Dev Disabil. 2013;34(11):4161-9.

19. Scarborough HS. Connecting early language and literacy to later reading (dis)abilities: evidence, theory, and practice. In: Neuman S , Dickinson D, editors, Handbook for research in early literacy. 2018. New York: Guilford Press. p. 23-36.

20. Loucas T, Baird G, Simonoff E, Slonims V. Phonological processing in children with specific language impairment with and without reading difficulties. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2016;51(5):581-8.

21. Hadley PA, Short H. The onset of tense marking in children at risk for specific language impairment. J Speech, Lang Hear Res. 2005;48(6):1344-62.

22. Hammer CS, Lawrence FR, Miccio AW. Exposure to english before and after entry into head start: Bilingual children's receptive language growth in Spanish and English. Int J Biling Educ Biling. 2008;11(1):30-56.

23. Giusti E, Befi-Lopes DM. Tradução e adaptação transcultural de instrumentos estrangeiros para o Português Brasileiro (PB). Pro-Fono R. Atualiz. Cientif. 2008;20(3):207-10.

24. Hresko WP, Reid DK, Hamill DD. Test of early language development. 3rd ed. San Antonio: Pearson Assessment; 1999.

25. Moojen S, Lamprecht RR, Santos RM, Freitas GM, Brodacz R, Siqueira M et al. CONFIAS - Consciência Fonológica: instrumento de avaliação sequencial. São Paulo: Casa do Psicólogo; 2003.

26. Germano GD, César ABPC, Capellini SA. Screening protocol for early identification of Brazilian children at risk for dyslexia. Front Psychol. 2017;8(OCT):1-13.

27. Germano GD, Capellini SA. Desempenho de escolares com dislexia, transtornos e dificuldades de aprendizagem em provas de habilidades metafonológicas (PROHFON). J Soc Bras Fonoaudiol. 2011;23(2):135-41.

28. Macchi L, Casalis S, Schelstraet MA. Phonological and orthographic reading routes in French-speaking children with severe developmental language disorder. J Comm Disord. 2019; 81:10-59.

29. Zhao J, Joshi RM, Dixon LQ, Chen S. Contribution of phonological, morphological and orthographic awareness to English word spelling: A comparison of EL1 and EFL models. Contemp Educ Psychol. 2017;49:185-94

30. Wilcox MJ, Gray S, Reiser M. Prescoolers with developmental speech and/or language impairment: efficacy of the teaching early literacy and language (TELL) curriculum. Early Child Quar. 2020; 51(2):124-43.
 


Submetido em:
30/08/2021

Aceito em:
07/12/2021

663bec4fa953954fdc1be633 cefac Articles

Revista CEFAC

Share this page
Page Sections