Revista CEFAC
https://revistacefac.org.br/article/doi/10.1590/1982-0216/20222432022
Revista CEFAC
Artigos Originais

Temporal auditory processing and the distinctive features of children with phonological disorder

Processamento auditivo temporal e os traços distintivos de crianças com transtorno fonológico

Paula Tavares Marchetti; Luísa Machado Dalcin; Sheila Andreoli Balen; Carolina Lisbôa Mezzomo

Downloads: 0
Views: 27

Abstract

Purpose: to assess whether there is a relationship between temporal auditory processing skills and altered distinctive features in cases of phonological disorder.

Methods: 18 children aged between 6 and 8 years, diagnosed with phonological disorders participated in the research. All children underwent speech-language screening, phonological assessment and the assessment of temporal processing skills through the GIN - Gap in Noise Test, TPF - Frequency Pattern Test and TPD - Duration Pattern Test. The numbers of altered phonemes and distinctive features and the level at which they were in the Implicational Model of Features Complexity were compared with those of the GIN, TPF and TPD tests. The significance level adopted for all statistical tests was 5% (p<0.05).

Results: in no comparison and correlation was there statistical significance, but the subjects evaluated showed low performance in temporal auditory processing tasks, according to normative testing standards.

Conclusion: in the general analysis, there was no relationship between temporal auditory skills and distinctive traits in the population assessed, even though they had difficulties in temporal auditory processing tasks.

Keywords

Speech, Speech Perception, Auditory Perception

Resumo

Objetivo: verificar se existe relação entre as habilidades de processamento auditivo temporal e os traços distintivos alterados nos casos de transtorno fonológico.

Métodos: participaram da pesquisa 18 crianças com idades entre 6:0 e 8:0 anos, com diagnóstico de transtorno fonológico. Todas as crianças passaram por triagem fonoaudiológica, avaliação fonológica da criança e pela avaliação das habilidades de processamento temporal por meio dos testes GIN – Gap in Noise Test, TPF – Teste Padrão de Frequência e TPD – Teste Padrão de Duração. Foram comparados os números de fonemas e traços distintivos alterados, o nível em que se encontravam no Modelo Implicacional de Complexidade de Traços com os resultados dos testes GIN, TPF e TPD. O nível de significância adotado para todos os testes estatísticos foi de 5% (p<0,05).

Resultados: em nenhuma comparação ou correlação houve significância estatística, porém os sujeitos avaliados apresentaram baixo desempenho nas tarefas de processamento auditivo temporal de acordo com os padrões normativos dos testes.

Conclusão: na análise geral, não houve a relação entre as habilidades auditivas temporais e os traços distintivos na população avaliada, muito embora tenham apresentado dificuldades nas tarefas de processamento temporal.

Palavras-chave

Fala; Percepção da Fala; Percepção Auditiva

Referências

1. Vilela N, Wertzner HF, Sanches SGG, Neves-Lobo IF, Carvallo RMM. Temporal processing in children with phonological disorders submitted to auditory training: a pilot study. J Soc Bras Fonoaudiol. 2012;24(1):42-8.

2. Murphy CFB, Pagan-Neves LO, Wertzner HF, Schochat E. Children with speech sound disorder: comparing a non-linguistic auditory approach with a phonological intervention approach to improve phonological skills. Front Psychol. 2015;6:64.

3. Wertzner HF, Pulga MJ, Pagan-Neves LO. Metaphonological skills among children with speech sound disorder: the influence of age and disorder severity. Audiol Commun Res. 2014;19(3):243-51.

4. Beattie RL, Manis FR. Rise time perception in children with reading and combined reading and language difficulties. J Learn Disabil. 2013;46(3):200-9.

5. Moraes TFD de, Feniman MR, Gonçalves T dos S, Crenitte PAP. Temporal processing, phonology and writing in lead-contaminated children. Rev. CEFAC. 2014;16(1):161-6.

6. Ramus F, Marshall CR, Rosen S, van der Lely HKJ. Phonological deficits in specific language impairment and developmental dyslexia: towards a multidimensional model. Brain. 2013;136(2):630-45.

7. Sussman E, Steinschneider M, Lee W, Lawson K. Auditory scene analysis in school-aged children with developmental language disorders. Int J Psychophysiol. 2015;95(2):113-24.

8. Boets B, Wouters J, Van Wieringen A, De Smedt B, Ghesquière P. Modelling relations between sensory processing, speech perception, orthographic and phonological ability, and literacy achievement. Brain Lang. 2008;106(1):29-40.

9. Cavalheiro LG, Brancalioni AR, Keske-Soares M. Prevalence of phonological disorders in children from Salvador, Bahia, Brazil. Rev Soc Bras Fonoaudiol. 2012;17(4):441-6.

10. Quintas VG, Attoni TM, Keske-Soares M, Mezzomo CL. O processamento auditivo e a combinação de traços distintivos na aquisição de fala em crianças com desvios fonológicos. Rev Soc Bras Fonoaudiol. 2011;16(2):167-73.

11. Muniz LF, Roazzi A, Schochat E, Teixeira CF, Lucena JA de. Avaliação da habilidade de resolução temporal, com uso do tom puro, em crianças com e sem desvio fonológico. Rev. CEFAC. 2007;9(4):550-62.

12. Quintas VG. A relação das habilidades do processamento auditivo com a consciência fonológica e com o desenvolvimento da fala. Rev Soc Bras Fonoaudiol. 2010;15(2):310.

13. Quintas VG, Attoni TM, Keske-Soares M, Mezzomo CL. Auditory processing in children with normal and disordered speech. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2010;76(6):718-22.

14. Santos J dos, Parreira L, Leite R. Habilidades de ordenação e resolução temporal em crianças com desvio fonológico. Rev. CEFAC. 2010;12(3):371-6.

15. Assis EF, Parreira LMMV, Lodi DF. Noise test: Gap detection in children with phonological deviation. Rev. CEFAC. 2013;15(1):79-88.

16. Vanvooren S, Poelmans H, Hofmann M, Ghesquière P, Wouters J. Hemispheric asymmetry in auditory processing of speech envelope modulations in prereading children. J Neurosci. 2014;34(4):1523-9.

17. Yathiraj A, Vanaja CS. Age related changes in auditory processes in children aged 6 to 10 years. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2015;79(8):1224-34.

18. Genaro KF, Berretin-Felix G, Rehder MIBC, Marchesan IQ. Avaliação miofuncional orofacial: protocolo MBGR. Rev. CEFAC. 2009;11(2):237-55.

19. Pinho S, Korn GP, Pontes P. Desvendando os segredos da voz. Músculos intrínsecos da laringe e dinâmica vocal. 1ª ed. Vol. 1. Editora Revinter: Rio de Janeiro; 2008.

20. Katz J. Tratado de Audiologia Clínica. 4º ed. Editora Manole: São Paulo; 1999.

21. AMERICAN SPEECH-LANGUAGE ASSOCIATION (ASHA) [homepage on the internet]. Configuration of Hearing Loss. [accessed 2022 Dec 19] 2015. Available at: https://www.asha.org/public/hearing/Configuration-of-Hearing-Loss/

22. Bernhardt B. The application of nonlinear phonological theory to intervention with one phonologically disordered child. Clin Linguist Phon. 1992;6(4):283-316.

23. Mota HB. Aquisição segmental do português: um modelo implicacional de complexidade de traços [dissertation]. Porto Alegre (RS): Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul; 1996.

24. Rangel GA. Uma análise auto-segmental da fonologia normal: estudo longitudinal de 3 crianças de 1:6 a 3:0 [thesis]. Porto Alegre (RS): Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul; 1998.

25. AUDITEC. Pitch Pattern Sequence - PPS and Duration Pattern Sequence - DPS [CD-ROOM]. AUDITEC's Tests; 1997.

26. AUDITEC. Gap-in-noise test [CD-ROM]. AUDITEC's Tests; 2015.

27. Balen SA, Moore DR, Sameshima K. Pitch and Duration Pattern Sequence Tests in 7-to 11-year-old children: results depend on response mode. J Am Acad Audiol. 2019;30(1):6-15.

28. Musiek FE, Shinn JB, Jirsa R, Bamiou D-E, Baran JA, Zaida E. GIN (Gaps-In-Noise) Test performance in subjects with confirmed central auditory nervous system involvement. Ear Hear. 2005;26(6):608-18.

29. Marculino CF, Rabelo CM, Schochat E. Gaps-in-Noise test: gap detection thresholds in 9-yearold normal-hearing children. J Soc Bras Fonoaudiol. 2011;23(4):364-7.

30. Shinn JB, Chermak GD, Musiek FE. GIN (Gaps-In-Noise) performance in the pediatric population. J Am Acad Audiol. 2009;20(4):229-38.

31. Guimarães ACF, Santos JN, Rabelo ATV, Magalhães M de C. The influence of noise on verbal auditory temporal ordering ability. Rev. CEFAC. 2015;17(1):209-15.

32. Loo JHY, Bamiou D-E, Rosen S. The impacts of language background and language-related disorders in auditory processing assessment. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2013;56(1):1-12.

33. Pinheiro FH, De Oliveira AM, Cardoso ACV, Capellini SA. Dichotic listening tests in students with learning disabilities. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2010;76(2):257-62.

34. Delecrode CR, Cardoso ACV, Frizzo ACF, Guida HL. Pitch pattern sequence and duration pattern tests in Brazil: literature review. Rev. CEFAC. 2014;16(1):283-92.

35. Barreto M, Muniz L, Teixeira C. Desempenho da habilidade a resolução temporal em crianças de 07 a 13 anos. Rev Soc Bras Fonoaudiol. 2004;9(4):220-8.

36. Rabelo ATV, Campos FR, Friche CP, Silva BSV Da, Friche AADL, Alves CRL et al. Speech and language disorders in children from public schools in Belo Horizonte. Rev Paul Pediatr. 2015;33(4):453-9.

37. Rocha-Muniz CN, Befi-Lopes DM, Schochat E. Investigation of auditory processing disorder and language impairment using the speech-evoked auditory brainstem response. Hear Res. 2012;294(1-2):143-52.

38. Murphy CFB, Zachi EC, Roque DT, Ventura DSF, Schochat E. Influence of memory, attention, IQ and age on auditory temporal processing tests: preliminary study. CoDAS. 2014;26(2):105-11.

39. Peter V, Wong K, Narne VK, Sharma M, Purdy SC, McMahon C. Assessing spectral and temporal processing in children and adults using temporal Modulation Transfer Function (TMTF), Iterated Ripple Noise (IRN) Perception, and Spectral Ripple Discrimination (SRD). J Am Acad Audiol. 2014;25(2):210-8.

40. Balen SA, Boeno MRM, Liebel G. A influência do nível socioeconômico na resolução temporal em escolares. Rev Soc Bras Fonoaudiol. 2010;15(1):7-13.

41. Soares AJC, Sanches SGG, Alves DC, Carvallo RMM, Cárnio MS. Temporal auditory processing and phonological awareness in reading and writing disorders: preliminary data. CoDAS. 2013;25(2):188-90.
 


Submetido em:
09/05/2022

Aceito em:
21/09/2022

663beecea9539550d61034f4 cefac Articles
Links & Downloads

Revista CEFAC

Share this page
Page Sections