Revista CEFAC
https://revistacefac.org.br/article/doi/10.1590/1982-0216/20222431822
Revista CEFAC
Artigos de Revisão

Effectiveness of nonsurgical treatments for trigeminal neuralgia: an overview protocol

A efetividade dos tratamentos não cirúrgicos na neuralgia do trigêmeo: um protocolo de overview

David Sildes Fidelis Florêncio; Ana Luiza Caldas Garcia; Edna Pereira Gomes de Morais; Silvia Damasceno Benevides; Giorvan Ânderson dos Santos Alves

Downloads: 0
Views: 150

Abstract

Purpose: to present an overview protocol for systematic reviews to synthesize and describe available evidence on the effectiveness of nonsurgical treatments for trigeminal neuralgia.

Methods: the protocol follows the method proposed by PRISMA-P guidelines for protocol reports. The search will be made in MEDLINE, EMBASE, LILACS, Cochrane, Web of Science, Scopus, SpeechBITE, PeDRO, and the grey literature (Google Scholar and ProQuest Dissertations and Theses), with no restriction on language or time of publication. A search strategy developed for MEDLINE will be adapted for each database. Two independent reviewers will screen the articles by title and abstract. Then, they will read the full texts of included articles, following the eligibility criteria. In case of disagreements, a third reviewer will come to a consensus. The data will be extracted with a standardized form. Information on the risk of bias and GRADE assessment will be recorded. AMSTAR-2 will assess the overall result reliability of the systematic reviews. Results will be presented in a flowchart, tables, and a narrative description.

Final Considerations: once carried out, this protocol will describe the current body of research on the topic and identify existing gaps on the basis of evidence.

Keywords

Trigeminal Neuralgia, Complementary Therapies, Meta-Analysis as Topic, Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis

Resumo

Objetivo: apresentar um protocolo de Overview das revisões sistemáticas (RSs) para sintetizar e descrever evidências disponíveis sobre a efetividade dos tratamentos não cirúrgicos na neuralgia do trigêmeo.

Métodos: o protocolo seguirá o método proposto pelas diretrizes do PRISMA-P para relato de protocolos. A busca será realizada nas bases de dados eletrônicas: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Lilacs, COCHRANE, Web of Science, Scopus, SpeechBITE, PeDRO, além de consulta à literatura cinzenta (Google Scholar e ProQuest Dissertations and Theses), sem restrições de idioma ou período de publicação. Uma estratégia de busca foi desenvolvida para MEDLINE e será adaptada para cada base de dados. O rastreio dos artigos pelo título e resumo será realizado por dois revisores independentes. Em seguida, farão leitura dos textos completos dos artigos incluídos, conforme os critérios de elegibilidade. Em discordância, um terceiro revisor fará o consenso. Os dados serão extraídos por meio de um formulário padronizado. Serão registradas informações de risco de viés e avaliação do GRADE. A ferramenta AMSTAR II avaliará a confiança geral dos resultados das RSs. Os resultados serão apresentados em um fluxograma, tabelas e descrição narrativa.

Considerações Finais: a execução deste protocolo descreverá o corpo atual de pesquisa sobre o tema e identificará lacunas existentes na base de evidências.

Palavras-chave

Neuralgia do Trigêmeo; Terapias Complementares; Metanálise como Assunto; Revisão Sistemática; Metanálise

Referências

1. Jones MR, Urits I, Ehrhardt KP, Cefalu JN, Kendrick JB, Park DJ et al. A comprehensive review of trigeminal neuralgia. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2019;23(10):74.

2. Bendtsen L, Zakrzewska JM, Abbott J, Braschinsky M, Di Stefano G, Donnet A et al. European Academy of Neurology guideline on trigeminal neuralgia. Eur J Neurol. 2019;26(6):831-49.

3. Cruccu G, Finnerup NB, Jensen TS, Scholz J, Sindou M, Svensson P et al. Trigeminal neuralgia: new classification and diagnostic grading for practice and research. Neurology. 2016;87(2):220-8.

4. Olesen J. Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society (IHS) The International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition. Cephalalgia. 2018;38(1):1-211.

5. Treede R-D, Rief W, Barke A, Aziz Q, Bennett MI, Benoliel R et al. A classification of chronic pain for ICD-11. Pain. 2015;156(6):1003-7.

6. Ibarra AMC, Biasotto-Gonzalez DA, Kohatsu EYI, de Oliveira SSI, Bussadori SK, Tanganeli JPC. Photobiomodulation on trigeminal neuralgia: systematic review. Lasers Med Sci. 2021;36(4):715-22.

7. Melek LN, Devine M, Renton T. The psychosocial impact of orofacial pain in trigeminal neuralgia patients: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018;47(7):869-78.

8. Wu TH, Hu LY, Lu T, Chen PM, Chen HJ, Shen CC et al. Risk of psychiatric disorders following trigeminal neuralgia: a nationwide population-based retrospective cohort study. J Headache Pain [journal on the internet]. 2015 [ accessed 2022 Jan 12];16(1). Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26174508/

9. Shaikh S, Yaacob H Bin, Abd Rahman R Bin. Lamotrigine for trigeminal neuralgia: efficacy and safety in comparison with carbamazepine. J Chin Med Assoc. 2011;74(6):243-9.

10. Benoliel R, Zini A, Khan J, Almoznino G, Sharav Y, Haviv Y. Trigeminal neuralgia (part II): Factors affecting early pharmacotherapeutic outcome. Cephalalgia. 2015;36(8):747-59.

11. Zakrzewska JM, Akram H. Neurosurgical interventions for the treatment of classical trigeminal neuralgia. Cochrane database Syst Rev. 2011;(9):CD007312.

12. Holste K, Chan AY, Rolston JD, Englot DJ. Pain outcomes following microvascular decompression for drug-resistant trigeminal neuralgia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Neurosurg. 2020;86(2):182-90.

13. Chen F, Niu Y, Meng F, Xu P, Zhang C, Xue Y et al. Recurrence rates after microvascular decompression in patients with primary trigeminal neuralgia and its influencing factors: a systematic review and meta-analysis based on 8,172 surgery patients. Front Neurol. [journal on the internet]. 2021 [accessed 2022 Jan 12]; 12. Available at: https://www.embase.com/search/results?subaction= viewrecord&id=L636211756&from=export

14. Wu A, Doshi T, Hung A, Garzon-Muvdi T, Bender MT, Bettegowda C et al. Immediate and long-term outcomes of microvascular decompression for mixed trigeminal neuralgia. World Neurosurg. 2018;117:e300-7.

15. Shackleton T, Ram S, Black M, Ryder J, Clark GT, Enciso R. The efficacy of botulinum toxin for the treatment of trigeminal and postherpetic neuralgia: a systematic review with meta-analyses. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2016;122(1):61-71.

16. Hu H, Chen L, Ma R, Gao H, Fang J. Acupuncture for primary trigeminal neuralgia: A systematic review and PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis. Complement Ther Clin Pract. 2019;34:254-67.

17. De la Torre Canales G, Poluha RL, Lora VM, Araújo DMOF, Stuginski-Barbosa J, Bonjardim LR et al. Botulinum toxin type A applications for masticatory myofascial pain and trigeminal neuralgia: what is the evidence regarding adverse effects? Clin Oral Investig. 2019;23(9):3411-21.

18. Moher D, Shamseer L, Clarke M, Ghersi D, Liberati A, Petticrew M et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Syst Rev. 2015;4(1):1.

19. da Costa Santos CM, de Mattos Pimenta CA, Nobre MRC. The PICO strategy for the research question construction and evidence search. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2007;15(3):508-11.

20. Shea BJ, Reeves BC, Wells G, Thuku M, Hamel C, Moran J et al. AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both. BMJ. 2017;358:j4008.

21. Balshem H, Helfand M, Schünemann HJ, Oxman AD, Kunz R, Brozek J et al. GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(4):401-6.

22. Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ et al., editors. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. 2nd Edition. Chichester (UK): John Wiley & Sons, 2019.
 


Submetido em:
17/03/2022

Aceito em:
20/06/2022

663bf139a95395515666e8f3 cefac Articles

Revista CEFAC

Share this page
Page Sections