Revista CEFAC
https://revistacefac.org.br/article/doi/10.1590/1982-0216/20222427521
Revista CEFAC
Artigos de Revisão

Stuttering intervention in children: an integrative literature review

Intervención de la tartamudez en niños: una revisión integrativa de la literatura

Daniela Rojas Contreras; Pamela Saavedra Rojas; Sergio Luis Aravena Gallardo

Downloads: 1
Views: 336

Abstract

Purpose: to describe intervention methodologies implemented in recent years in stuttering children.

Methods: a search was performed for empirical articles on interventions in stuttering children aged 2.5 to 7 years. The search was carried out in Embase, WOS, Pubmed, and Scopus, considering articles published between January 2014 and June 2020.

Literature Review: 11 articles were selected out of the 1,099 retrieved. Different approaches were observed, of which the Lidcombe program showed the most evidence. Most studies were conducted on English-speaking children and participants were assessed regarding linguistic and non-linguistic aspects. All studies considered parental involvement in the intervention. No investigation took measurements for more than 24 months. Individual interventions predominated.

Conclusion: good therapeutic results were found in all reviewed interventions. Research comparing two types of treatments did not find one to be superior to the other.

Keywords

Stuttering, Child, Preschool, Therapeutics, Childhood-Onset Fluency Disorder, Speech Disorders

Resumen

Objetivo: describir las metodologías de intervención implementadas durante los últimos años en niños con tartamudez

Métodos: se realizó la búsqueda de artículos empíricos de tratamiento en niños con tartamudez entre los 2.5 a 7 años. Se consideraron artículos publicados entre enero del año 2014 a junio del año 2020. La búsqueda se realizó en las bases de datos Embase, WOS, Pubmed y Scopus. Junto a lo anterior se realizó un análisis de las referencias de los artículos seleccionados.

Revisión de la Literatura: se seleccionaron 11 artículos de 1.099 revisados. Se observaron distintas propuestas de intervención de las cuales el Programa Lidcombe es el que mayor evidencia presenta. La mayoría de las investigaciones fueron realizadas en hablantes de lengua inglesa. Los participantes son evaluados tanto en aspectos lingüísticos como no lingüísticos. Todos consideraron la participación de los padres en la intervención. No hubo investigaciones con mediciones a más de 24 meses. Predomina la modalidad de intervención individual.

Conclusión: se evidencian buenos resultados terapéuticos en todas las intervenciones revisadas. En las investigaciones que compararon dos tipos de tratamiento no se observó la superioridad de uno por sobre otro.

Palabras clave

Tartamudeo; Preescolar; Terapéutica; Trastorno de Fluidez de Inicio en la Infancia; Trastornos del Habla

Referências

1. World Health Organization. CIE-11 para estadísticas de mortalidad y morbilidad, 6A 01.1 Trastorno del desarrollo de la fluidez del habla. [May 2021]. Available from: https://icd.who.int/browse11/l-m/es#/http://id.who.int/icd/entity/654956298

2. American Psychiatric Association. Guía de consulta de los criterios diagnósticos del DSM-5 (R): Spanish Edition of the Desk Reference to the Diagnostic Criteria From DSM-5 (R). Arlington, TX, United States of America: American Psychiatric Association Publishing; 2014.

3. Perkins WH. What is Stuttering? J Speech Hear Disord. 1990;55(3):370-82.

4. Prasse J, Kikano G. Stuttering: an overview. Am Fam Physician. 2008;77(9):1271-6.

5. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. La tartamudez. [June 2021]. Available from: https://www.asha.org/public/speech/spanish/la-tartamudez/

6. Yaruss J, Quesal R. Stuttering and the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health: an update. J Commun Disord. 2004;37(1):35-52.

7. Leal G, Guitar B, Junqueira A. Fundamentos teóricos y evaluación clínica de la Tartamudez en niños, adolescentes y adultos. En: Susanibar F, Dioses A, Marchesan I, Guzmán M, Leal G, Guitar B, Junqueira A, editors. Trastornos del Habla: de los fundamentos a la evaluación. Eos; 2016. p.211-81.

8. Yairi E, Ambrose N. Early childhood stuttering I: persistency and recovery rates. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1999;42(5):1097-112.

9. Rodríguez MR. Intervención sobre la tartamudez temprana. Rev logop foniatr audiol. 2001;21(1):2-16.

10. Leal G, Junqueira A, Escobar R. Nuevos desafíos en el tratamiento de la tartamudez. Logopedia.mail. 2015;70(1):1-9.

11. Shafiei B, Faramarzi S, Abedi A, Dehqan A, Scherer R. Effects of the Lidcombe Program and parent-child interaction therapy on stuttering reduction in preschool children. Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2019;71(1):29-41.

12. *de Sonneville-Koedoot C, Stolk E, Rietveld T, Franken M-C. Direct versus indirect treatment for preschool children who stutter: The RESTART randomized trial. PLoS One. 2015;10(7):e0133758.

13. *Millard S, Zebrowski P, Kelman E. Palin Parent-Child Interaction therapy: the bigger picture. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2018;27(3S):1211-23.

14. Guitar B. Stuttering: an integrated approach to its nature and treatment. 4th ed. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2013.

15. Starkweather C, Gottwald S. The demands and capacities model II: clinical applications. J Fluency Disord. 1990;15(3):143-57.

16. Keilmann A, Neumann K, Zöller D, Freude C. Clinical trial of the D.E.L.P.H.I.N. speech treatment for children and adolescents who stutter. Logoped Phoniatr Vocol. 2018;43(4):155-68.

17. Franken M, Laroes E. RESTART-DCM Method, Revised edition. [June 2021] Available from: https://restartdcm.nl/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/RestartDCM-Method-2021_online.pdf

18. Lidcombe Program Trainers Consortium. About the Lidcombe Program. [June 2021]. Available from: https://www.lidcombeprogram.org/about-lidcombe-program/about-the-lidcombe-program-2/

19. McGill M, Noureal N, Siegel J. Telepractice treatment of stuttering: a systematic review. Telemed J E Health. 2019;25(5):359-68.

20. Baxter S, Johnson M, Blank L, Cantrell A, Brumfitt S, Enderby P et al. Non-pharmacological treatments for stuttering in children and adults: a systematic review and evaluation of clinical effectiveness, and exploration of barriers to successful outcomes. Health Technol Assess. 2016;20(2):1-302, v-vi.

21. Nye C, Vanryckeghem M, Schwartz J, Herder C, Turner H, Howard C. Behavioral stuttering interventions for children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2013;56(3):921-32.

22. Herder C, Howard C, Nye C, Vanryckeghem M. Effectiveness of behavioral stuttering treatment: a systemic review and meta-analysis. Contemp Issues Commun Sci Disord. 2006;33(Spring):61-73.

23. Bothe A, Davidow J, Bramlett R, Ingham R. Stuttering treatment research 1970-2005: I. Systematic review incorporating trial quality assessment of behavioral, cognitive, and related approaches. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2006;15(4):321-41.

24. Trajkovski N, Andrews C, Onslow M, O'Brian S, Packman A, Menzies R. A phase II trial of the Westmead Program: syllable-timed speech treatment for pre-school children who stutter. Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2011;13(6):500-9.

25. *Druker K, Mazzucchelli T, Beilby J. An evaluation of an integrated fluency and resilience program for early developmental stuttering disorders. J Commun Disord. 2019;78:69-83.

26. *Donaghy M, Harrison E, O'Brian S, Menzies R, Onslow M, Packman A et al. An investigation of the role of parental request for self-correction of stuttering in the Lidcombe Program. Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2015;17(5):511-7.

27. *Arnott S, Onslow M, O'Brian S, Packman A, Jones M, Block S. Group Lidcombe program treatment for early stuttering: a randomized controlled trial. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2014;57(5):1606-18.

28. *Ferdinands B, Bridgman K. An investigation into the relationship between parent satisfaction and child fluency in the Lidcombe Program: clinic versus telehealth delivery. Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2019;21(4):347-54.

29. *McCulloch J, Swift M, Wagnitz B. Case file audit of Lidcombe program outcomes in a student-led stuttering clinic. Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2017;19(2):165-73.

30. *de Sonneville-Koedoot C, Bouwmans C, Franken M-C, Stolk E. Economic evaluation of stuttering treatment in preschool children: The RESTART-study. J Commun Disord. 2015;58:106-18.

31. *Bridgman K, Onslow M, O'Brian S, Jones M, Block S. Lidcombe Program webcam treatment for early stuttering: a randomized controlled trial. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2016;59(5):932-9.

32. *Sawyer J, Matteson C, Ou H, Nagase T. The effects of parent-focused slow relaxed speech intervention on articulation rate, response time latency, and fluency in preschool children who stutter. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2017;60(4):794-809.

33. *Guitar B, Kazenski D, Howard A, Cousins S, Fader E, Haskell P. Predicting treatment time and long-term outcome of the Lidcombe Program: a replication and reanalysis. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2015;24(3):533-44.

34. Blomgren M. Behavioral treatments for children and adults who stutter: a review. Psychology Research and Behavior Management. 2013;6(1):9-19.

35. Euler H, Merkel A, Hente K, Neef N, Wolff von Gudenberg A, Neumann K. Speech restructuring group treatment for 6-to-9-year-old children who stutter: a therapeutic trial. J Commun Disord. 2021;89(106073):106073.

36. Yaruss J, Coleman C, Hammer D. Treating preschool children who stutter: Description and preliminary evaluation of a family-focused treatment approach. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2006;37(2):118-36.

37. Shenker R, Santayana G. What are the options for the treatment of stuttering in preschool children? Semin Speech Lang. 2018;39(4):313-23.

38. Veerle Waelkens. Mini-KIDS: direct therapy for young children who stutter. Theory Method Material. 2018.

39. Subasi M, Van Borsel J, Van Eerdenbrugh S. The Lidcombe Program for early stuttering in non-English-speaking countries: a systematic review. Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2021;1-14.

40. Gebara M, Ginhson M. Estrategias de con-ciencia. Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina: Los buscadores de Quintum; 2011.

41. World Health Organization. Clasificación internacional del funcionamiento de la discapacidad y de la salud: CIF: short version, Short version. Organización Mundial de la Salud. 2001. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/43360

42. Oliveira CMC de, Pereira LJ. Persistent developmental stuttering: fluency assessment pre and post-treatment. Rev. CEFAC. 2013;16(1):120-30.

43. Bernstein N. Selecting treatments and monitoring outcomes: The circle of evidence-based practice and client-centered care in treating a preschool child who stutters. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2018;49(1):13-22.

44. Ortega E. Contributing factors of success in speech fluency therapy. Ursidae: the undergraduate research journal at the University of Northern Colorado. 2013;3(2):Article 2.
 


Submetido em:
22/09/2021

Aceito em:
02/05/2022

663ab5dba953954ebd6b95b6 cefac Articles

Revista CEFAC

Share this page
Page Sections