Revista CEFAC
https://revistacefac.org.br/article/doi/10.1590/1982-0216/202224111021
Revista CEFAC
Artigos de Revisão

Training for fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing parameter analysis: a scoping review protocol

Treinamento para análise de parâmetros da videoendoscopia da deglutição: um protocolo de revisão de escopo

Bianca Oliveira Ismael da Costa; Liliane dos Santos Machado; Milena Magalhães Augusto; Thaís Coelho Alves; Leandro Pernambuco

Downloads: 0
Views: 86

Abstract

Purpose: to present a scoping review protocol to identify and map available evidence on training for fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing parameter analysis.

Methods: the protocol follows the method proposed by the Joanna Briggs Institute and the PRISMA-P guidelines for review protocol reports. The survey will be made in MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, CINAHL, and grey literature. A search strategy has been developed for MEDLINE, which will be adapted for each database. Two independent reviewers will screen the articles by title and abstract. Then, they will read the full text of the included articles, considering the eligibility criteria. The data will be extracted with a standardized form. The results will be presented in a flowchart and narrative summary, following the PRISMA-ScR guidelines.

Literature Review: there is a scarcity of research describing visual-perceptual training methods to analyze FEES parameters and inconsistent data to guide clinical decision-making. This review will provide comprehensive information on developing training for this type of analysis.

Conclusion: this scoping review protocol will present the overall state of research on the topic and identify existing gaps in the base of evidence.

Keywords

Deglutition, Deglutition Disorders, Endoscopy, Education, Teaching

Resumo

Objetivo: apresentar um protocolo de revisão de escopo para identificar e mapear as evidências disponíveis sobre treinamento para a análise de parâmetros da videoendoscopia da deglutição.

Métodos: o protocolo seguirá o método proposto pelo Joanna Briggs Institute e as diretrizes PRISMA-P para relato de protocolos de revisão. A busca será feita na MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, CINAHL e literatura cinzenta. Uma estratégia de busca foi desenvolvida para a MEDLINE, que será adaptada para cada base de dados. Dois revisores independentes rastrearão os artigos pelo título e resumo. Em seguida, farão a leitura do texto completo dos artigos incluídos, considerando os critérios de elegibilidade. Os dados serão extraídos com um formulário padronizado. Os resultados serão apresentados em fluxograma e resumo narrativo, seguindo as diretrizes do PRISMA-ScR.

Revisão da literatura: há escassez de pesquisas que descrevam métodos de treinamento perceptivovisual para analisar parâmetros da VED e dados inconsistentes para orientar a tomada de decisão clínica. Esta revisão fornecerá informações abrangentes sobre o desenvolvimento de treinamento para esse tipo de análise.

Conclusão: este protocolo de revisão de escopo apresentará o estado geral das pesquisas sobre o tema e identificará as lacunas existentes na base de evidências.

Palavras-chave

: Deglutição; Transtornos de Deglutição; Endoscopia; Educação; Ensino

Referências

1. Langmore SE. History of fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing for evaluation and management of pharyngeal dysphagia: changes over the years. Dysphagia. 2017;32(1):27-38.

2. Langmore SE, Schatz K, Olsen N. Fiberoptic endoscopic examination of swallowing safety: a new procedure. Dysphagia. 1988;2(4):216-9.

3. Bastian RW. Videoendoscopic evaluation of patients with dysphagia: An adjunct to the modified barium swallow. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1991;104(3):339-50.

4. Aviv JE, Debell M, Keen MS, Blitzer A, Martin JH. Air pulse quantification of supraglottic and pharyngeal sensation: A new technique. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1993;102(10):777-80.

5. Doria S, Abreu MAB, Buch R, Assumpção R, Nico MAC, Ekcley CA et al. Comparison of functional endoscopic swallow study (FESS) vs. videofluoroscopy (VF) in patients with stroke. Rev. Bras. Otorrinolaringol [journal on the Internet]. 2003 Out [accessed 2021 November 25]; 69(5):[about 6 p]. Available at: https://www.scielo.br/j/rboto/a/HxxNj5sjKhvGt4mfWGDcvVP/?lang=pt#

6. Butler SG, Markley L, Sanders B, Stuart A. Reliability of the penetration aspiration scale with flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2015;124(6):480-3.

7. Tohara H, Nakane A, Murata S, Mikushi S, Ouchi Y, Wakasugi Y et al. Inter- and intra-rater reliability in fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing. J Oral Rehabil. 2010;37(12):884-91.

8. Kaneoka AS, Langmore SE, Krisciunas GP, Field K, Scheel R, Mcnally E et al. The Boston residue and clearance scale: Preliminary reliability and validity testing. Folia Phoniat Logop. 2013;65(6):312-7.

9. Neubauer PD, Rademaker AW, Leder SB. The Yale Pharyngeal Residue Severity Rating Scale: an anatomically defined and image-based tool. Dysphagia. 2015;30(5):521-8.

10. Pilz W, Vanbelle S, Kremer B, van Hooren MR, van Becelaere T, Roodenburg N et al. Observers' agreement on measurements in fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing. Dysphagia. 2016;31(2):180-7.

11. Warnecke T, Suttrup I, Schröder JB, Osada N, Oelenberg S, Hamacher C et al. Levodopa responsiveness of dysphagia in advanced Parkinson's disease and reliability testing of the FEES-Levodopa-test. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2016;28:100-6.

12. Gerschke M, Schöttker-Königer T, Förster A, Netzebandt JF, Beushausen UM. Validation of the German Version of the Yale Pharyngeal Residue Severity Rating Scale. Dysphagia. 2019;34(3):308-14.

13. Atar Y, Atar S, Ilgin C, Anarat MEA, Uygan U, Uyar Y. Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Translation of the Yale Pharyngeal Residue Severity Rating Scale. Dysphagia. 2021:1-9. Ahead of print.

14. Rosenbek JC, Robbins JA, Roecker EB, Coyle JL, Wood JL. A Penetration-Aspiration Scale. Dysphagia. 1996;11:93-8.

15. Colodny N. Interjudge and intrajudge reliabilities in Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (Fees (r)) Using the Penetration-Aspiration Scale: a replication study. Dysphagia. 2002;17(4):308-15.

16. Hey C, Pluschinski P, Pajunk R, Almahameed A, Girth L, Sader R et al. Penetration-aspiration: is their detection in FEES(r) reliable without video recording? Dysphagia. 2015;30(4):418-22.

17. Schindler A, Mozzanica F, Sonzini G, Plebani D, Urbani E, Pecis M et al. Oropharyngeal dysphagia in patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. Dysphagia. 2014;29(1):44-51.

18. Martin-Harris B, Brodsky MB, Michel Y, Lee F-S, Walters B. Delayed initiation of the pharyngeal swallow: normal variability in adult swallows. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2007;50(3):585-94.

19. Langmore SE, Olney RK, Lomen-Hoerth C, Miller BL. Dysphagia in patients with frontotemporal lobar dementia. Arch Neurol. 2007;64(1):58-62.

20. Souza GAD de. Confiabilidade inter e intra-juízes da Escala de Classificação para Escape Oral Posterior na Videoendoscopia de Deglutição [Thesis]. Marília (SP): Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp); 2021.

21. Pisegna JM, Langmore SE. Parameters of Instrumental Swallowing Evaluations: describing a diagnostic dilemma. Dysphagia. 2016;31(3):462-72.

22. Swan K, Cordier R, Brown T, Speyer R. Psychometric properties of visuoperceptual measures of videofluoroscopic and fibre-endoscopic evaluations of swallowing: a systematic review. Dysphagia. 2019;34(1):2-33.

23. Curtis JA, Borders JC, Perry SE, Dakin AE, Seikaly ZN, Troche MS. Visual Analysis of Swallowing Efficiency and Safety (VASES): a standardized approach to rating pharyngeal residue, penetration, and aspiration during FEES. Dysphagia. 2022;37(2):417-35.

24. Borges-Andrade JE, Abbad G da S, Mourão L. Treinamento, desenvolvimento e educação em organizações e trabalho: Fundamentos para a gestão de pessoas. Porto Alegre (RS): Artmed; 2006.

25. Benadom EM, Potter NL. The use of simulation in training graduate students to perform transnasal endoscopy. Dysphagia. 2011;26(4):352-60.

26. Dziewas R, Glahn J, Helfer C, Ickenstein G, Keller J, Lapa S et al. FEES für neurogene dysphagien: ausbildungscurriculum der Deutschen gesellschaft für neurologie und Deutschen schlaganfall-gesellschaft. Nervenarzt. 2014;85(8):1006-15.

27. Dziewas R, Baijens L, Schindler A, Verin E, Michou E, Clave P. European Society for Swallowing Disorders FEES Accreditation Program for Neurogenic and Geriatric Oropharyngeal Dysphagia. Dysphagia. 2017;32(6):725-33.

28. Yoshida M, Kagaya H, Kamakura Y, Miura Y, Saitoh E, Okawa Y et al. Safety and the effectiveness of a new education program for nurses to assess swallowing function using fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES). Jpn J Nurs Sci. 2020;17(2):e12313.

29. Robinson HF. Enhancing the learning and supervision framework for training in flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2021;29(3):204-12.

30. Brady SL, Rao N, Gibbons PJ, Williams L, Hakel M, Pape T. Face-to-face versus online training for the interpretation of findings in the fiberoptic endoscopic exam of the swallow procedure. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2018;9:433-41.

31. Peters MDJ, Godfrey CM, Khalil H, McInerney P, Parker D, Soares CB. Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews. Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2015;13(3):141-6.

32. Moher D, Shamseer L, Clarke M, Ghersi D, Liberati A, Petticrew M et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Syst Rev. 2015;4(1):1.

33. Peters MDJ, Marnie C, Tricco AC, Pollock D, Munn Z, Alexander L et al. Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews. JBI Evidence Synthesis. 2020;18(10):2119-26.

34. Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, O'Brien KK, Colquhoun H, Levac D et al. PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med. 2018;169(7):467-73.
 


Submetido em:
26/11/2021

Aceito em:
23/12/2021

66393f42a9539536c1342964 cefac Articles

Revista CEFAC

Share this page
Page Sections