Revista CEFAC
https://revistacefac.org.br/article/doi/10.1590/1982-0216/20212369321
Revista CEFAC
Original Articles

Development of infants presented with congenital syphilis in their first months of life

Thalinny da Costa Silva; Leila Juliane Pinheiro do Nascimento Santos; Nívia Maria Rodrigues Arrais; Sheila Andreoli Balen

Downloads: 0
Views: 461

Abstract

Purpose: to evaluate the cognitive, language, and motor development of infants with congenital syphilis in their first months of life.

Methods: a sample of 52 infants, from 21 to 112 days of age, born in public maternity hospitals, divided into a study group of 28 infants with congenital syphilis and a control group 24 infants without risk indicators for hearing loss. They underwent the Neonatal Hearing Screening Protocol with automated Brainstem Auditory Evoked Potential. The research instrument was the Bayley-III Scale, consisting of the cognitive, language (receptive and expressive), and motor (fine and gross) subscales. The raw scores were entered into the software that accompanies the Bayley-III scale kit to calculate the scores (scaled and composite) and perform qualitative analysis. The Mann-Whitney test and the Wilcoxon test was applied and used a 5% significance level.

Results: a similarity between groups for the demographic parameters, maternal education level, and socioeconomic level, was seen. There was no statistically significant difference between groups when comparing the cognitive, receptive language, expressive language, fine motor, and gross motor subscales.

Conclusion: infants with congenital syphilis treated at birth have a cognitive, language, and motor development within that expected for their age group in their first months of life.

Keywords

Syphilis, Congenital; Infant; Infant Development; Cognition; Child Language; Psychomotor Performance

References

1. World Health Organization [Internet]. WHO publishes new estimates on congenital syphilis. [homepage on the internet] 2019. [accessed 2019 Oct 12]. Available at: https://www.who.int/ reproductivehealth/congenital-syphilis-estimates/ en/

2. Liu H, Han Y, Chen X, Bai L, Guo S, Li L et al. Comparison of efficacy of treatments for early syphilis: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and observational studies. PLoS One. 2017;12(6):e0180001. https://doi.org/10.1371/ journal.pone.0180001

3. Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Secretaria de Vigilância em Saúde. Departamento de Doenças de Condições Crônicas e Infecções Sexualmente Transmissíveis. Protocolo Clínico e Diretrizes Terapêuticas para Prevenção da Transmissão Vertical do HIV, Sífilis e Hepatites Virais. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde; 2019;1:248. Available at: http://www.aids.gov.br/pt-br/pub/2015/ Silva TC, Santos LJPN, Arrais NMR, Balen SA protocolo-clinico-e-diretrizes-terapeuticas-paraprevencao-da-transmissao-vertical-de-hiv

4. Verghese VP, Hendson L, Singh A, Guenette T, Gratrix J, Robinson JL. Early childhood neurodevelopmental outcomes in infants exposed to infectious syphilis in utero. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2018;37(6). doi:10.1097/INF.0000000000001842

5. Lago EG, Vaccari A, Fiori RM. Clinical features and follow-up of congenital syphilis. Sexually Transmitted Diseases. 2013;40(2):85-94. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0b013e31827bd688

6. Rowe CR, Newberry DM, Jnah AJ. Congenital syphilis: a discussion of epidemiology, diagnosis, management, and nurses. Rolein Early Identification and Treatment. 2018;18(6):438-45. doi: 10.1097/ ANC.0000000000000534

7. American Academy of Pediatrics. Identifying infants and young children with developmental disorders in the medical home: an algorithm for developmental surveillance and screening. Pediatrics. 2006;118(1):405-20. https://doi. org/10.1542/peds.2006-1231

8. American Academy of Pediatrics. Developmental surveillance and screening of infants and young children. Pediatrics. 2001;108(1):192-5. https://doi. org/10.1542/peds.108.1.192

9. Albuquerque KA, Cunha ACB. Novas tendências em instrumentos para triagem do desenvolvimento infantil no Brasil: uma revisão sistemática. J Hum Growth Dev. 2020;30(2):188-96. https://dx.doi. org/10.7322/jhgd.v30.10366

10. Bayley N. Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development – Third Edition. 3rd ed. San Antonio, TX: Harcourt Assessment. 2006.

11. McCarthy AM, Wehby GL, Barron S, Aylward GP, Castilla EE, Javois LC et al. Application of Neurodevelopmental Screening to a sample of South American infants: The Bayley Infant Neurodevelopmental Screener (BINS). Infant Behav Dev. 2012;35(2):280-94. https://doi:10.1016/j. infbeh.2011.12.003

12. Wehby GL, Trujillo AJ. Differences in early cognitive and receptive-expressive neurodevelopment by ancestry and underlying pathways in Brazil and Argentina. Infant Behav Dev. 2017;46:100-14. https://doi:10.1016/j.infbeh.2016.12.001

13. Durrant C, Wong HS, Cole TJ, Hutchon B, Collier L, Wright A et al. Developmental trajectories of infants born at less than 30 weeks’ gestation on the Bayley-III Scales. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal. 2020;105:623-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2019- 317810

14. Yue A, Jiang Q, Wang B, Abbey C, Medina A, Shi Y et al. Concurrent validity of the ages and stages questionnaire and the Bayley Scales of Infant Development III in China. PLoS One. 2019;14(9):e0221675. https://doi.org/10.1371/ journal.pone.0221675

15. Joint Committee of Infant Hearing. Year 2019 position statement: principles and guidelines for early hearing detection and intervention programs. JEHDI. 2019;4(2):1-44. doi: 10.15142/fptk-b748

16. Associação Brasileira de Empresas de Pesquisa – ABEP [homepage on the internet]. Critério Brasil. São Paulo: Associação Brasileira de Empresas de Pesquisa; 2018 [accessed 2020 Mar 14] Available at: https://www.abep.org

17. Gomez GB, Kamb ML, Newman LM, Mark J, Nathalie Broutetc N, Hawkesd SJ. Untreated maternal syphilis and adverse outcomes of pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Bull World Health Organ. 2013;91(3):217-26. https://doi:10.2471/BLT.12.107623

18. Woods CR. Congenital syphilis–persisting pestilence. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2009;28(6):536-7. doi: 10.1097/INF.0b013e3181ac8a69

19. Doyle W, Anderson PJ. Adult outcome of extremely preterm infants. Pediatrics. 2010;126(2):342-51. doi: 10.1542/peds.2010-0710

20. Figueiredo DCMM, Figueiredo AM, Souza TKB, Tavares G, Vianna RPT. Relação entre oferta de diagnóstico e tratamento da sífilis na atenção básica sobre a incidência de sífilis gestacional e congênita. Cad Saúde Pública. 2020;36(3):e00074519. doi: 10.1590/0102-311X00074519


Submitted date:
10/12/2021

Accepted date:
11/08/2021

6a0a4dc1a953956fd3521e74 cefac Articles
Links & Downloads

Revista CEFAC

Share this page
Page Sections