International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health in adult and older users of an audiology services
Classificação internacional de funcionalidade, incapacidade e saúde em adultos e idosos usuários de um serviço de audiologia
Valquíria Conceição Souza; Stela Maris Aguiar Lemos
Abstract
Purpose: to describe aspects of functioning and disability related to hearing and sociodemographic factors of audiology service users.
Methods: an exploratory study with a probabilistic sample comprising 152 participants who answered a socioeconomic and assistance questionnaire. The functioning and disability were analyzed by means of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health. Descriptive data analyses were conducted.
Results: most users of the Hearing Health Care Service considered they had mild (41.2%) or moderate (34.2%) disability in b1560 Auditory perception, and mild (36%) and moderate (35.1%) disability in b230 Hearing Functions. In Activities and Participation, the users of the Hearing Health Care Service obtained better results in d330 Speaking (83.3%), d315 Communicating with and receiving nonverbal messages (65.8%), and d760 Family relationships (65.1%). The hearing aid was a facilitator in these subjects' social interaction with the environment. Most of those attending the Audiology Outpatient Center did not have disabilities or difficulties in the activities and participation, and the environment was a facilitator.
Conclusion: most of the participants attending the Hearing Health Care Service had a disability in auditory perception and hearing functions. However, such a disability was not a limiting factor in the performance of most of the activities and participations assessed.
Keywords
Resumo
Objetivo: descrever aspectos da funcionalidade e incapacidade, relacionados à audição e fatores sociodemográficos de usuários de um serviço de audiologia.
Métodos: estudo exploratório com amostra probabilística composta por 152 indivíduos que responderam um questionário socioeconômico e assistencial. A funcionalidade e incapacidade foram analisadas por meio da Classificação Internacional de Funcionalidade, Incapacidade e Saúde. Foram realizadas análises descritivas dos dados.
Resultados: a maior parte dos usuários do Serviço de Saúde Auditiva considerou ter deficiência ligeira 41,2% e moderada 34,2% em b1560Percepção Auditiva e deficiência ligeira 36% e moderada 35,1% em b230Funções Auditivas. Em Atividades e Participação os usuários do Serviço de Saúde Auditiva obtiveram melhores resultados em d330Falar 83,3%, d315Comunicar e receber mensagens não verbais 65,8% e d760Relacionamentos familiares 65,1%. O Aparelho de Amplificação Sonora Individual foi um facilitador na interação social desses sujeitos com o ambiente. A maioria dos indivíduos atendidos no Ambulatório de Audiologia não apresentou deficiência ou dificuldades nas atividades e participação e o ambiente atuou como um facilitador.
Conclusão: a maior parte dos participantes atendidos no Serviço de Saúde Auditiva apresentou deficiência na percepção auditiva e funções auditivas, porém essa deficiência não atuou como um fator limitante no desempenho da maioria das atividades e participações avaliadas.
Palavras-chave
Referencias
1. WHO: World Health Organization. Deafness and hearing loss. [citado em 10 de Novembro de 2015]. Disponível em: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs300/en/
2. IBGE: Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. Censo demográfico de 2010: Resultados. [citado em 9 de Novembro de 2015]. Disponível em: http://censo2010.ibge.gov.br/resultados
3. Danermark B, Granberg S, Kramer SE, Selb M, Möller C. The creation of a comprehensive and a brief core set for hearing loss using the International Classification of Functioning Disability and Health. Am J Audiol. 2013;22(2):323-8.
4. Alfakir R, Holmes AE, Noreen F. Functional performance in older adults with hearing loss: application of the International Classification of Functioning Brief Core Set for Hearing Loss: a pilot study. Int J Audiol. 2015;54(9):579-86.
5. Chisolm TH, Johnson CE, Danhauer JL, Portz LJP, Abrams HB, Lesner S et al. A systematic review of health-related quality of life and hearing aids: final report of the American Academy of Audiology Task Force on the Health-Related Quality of Life Benefits of Amplification in Adults. J Am Acad Audiol. 2007;18(2):151-83.
6. OMS: Organização Mundial de Saúde. CIF: a Classificação Internacional de Funcionalidade, Incapacidade e Saúde. 1. ed. São Paulo: Edusp; 2015.
7. Mueller M, Schuster E, Strobl R, Grill E. Identification of aspects of functioning, disability and health relevant to patients experiencing vertigo: a qualitative study using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Health Qual Life Outcomes [periodico na Internet]. 2012 [citado em 10 de Novembro 2018]; 10(1):[aproximadalmente 9 p.]. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-10-75.
8. Ramkumar V, Rangasayee R. Studying tinnitus in the ICF framework. Int J Audiol. 2010;49(9):645-50.
9. Morettin M, Cardoso MRA, Delamura AM, Zabeu JS, Amantini RCB, Bevilacqua MC. Use of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health for monitoring patients using cochlear implants. CoDAS. 2013;25(3):216-23.
10. Antunes APA, Silva CSR, Ferreira LP, Palladino RRR. Use of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health in Speech-Language-Hearing Therapy: an integrative literature review. Rev. CEFAC. 2019;21(4):e18018.
11. Santos ACM, Silva AMC, Luccia GCP, Botelho C, Riva DRD. Psychosocial hearing disadvantage and associated factors among construction workers in Mato Grosso, Brazil. Rev Bras Epidemiol. 2017;20(3):501-13.
12. Jardim DS, Maciel FJ, Lemos SMA. Disabling hearing loss: analysis of associated factors. Audiol., Commun Res. [periodico na Internet]. 2017 [citado em 10 de Novembro de 2018]; 22(e1765):[aproximadamente 9 p.] Disponível em: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_issuetoc&pid=2317-643120170001&lng=en&nrm=iso.
13. ABEP: Associação Brasileira de Empresas de Pesquisa. Critério de Classificação Econômica Brasil. [citado em 9 de Outubro de 2015]. Disponível em: http://www.abep.org/criterio-brasil.
14. WHO: World Health Organization. Active Ageing – A Policy Framework. A Contribution of the World Health Organization to the Second United Nations World Assembly on Aging. [citado em 19 de Agosto de 2020]. Disponível em: https://extranet.who.int/agefriendlyworld/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/WHO-Active-Ageing-Framework.pdf.
15. Silman S, Silverman CA. Basic audiologic testing. In: Silman S, Silverman CA. Auditory diagnosis: principles and applications. San Diego: Singular Publishing Group; 1997. p. 44-52.
16. Lloyd LL, Kaplan H. Audiometric Interpretation: a manual basic audiometry. University Park Press: Baltimore; 1978.
17. Conselho Federal de Fonoaudiologia. Manual de procedimentos em audiometria tonal limiar, logoaudiometria e medidas de imitância acústica [Homepage na Internet]. 2013 [citado em 5 de Dezembro de 2015]. Disponível em: http://www.fonoaudiologia.org.br/publicacoes/Manual%20de%20Audiologia%20.pdf.
18. WHO: World Health Organization. WHO Ear and Hearing Disorders Survey: Protocol (Part 1: Survey methods). [citado em 9 de Outubro de 2015]. Disponível em: http://whqlibdoc.who.int/hq/1999/WHO_PBD_PDH_99.8(1).pdf.
19. Jerger J. Clinical experience with impedance audiometry. Arch Otolaryngol. 1970;92(4):311-24.
20. Aiello CP, Lima II, Ferrari DV. Validade e confiabilidade do questionário de handicap auditivo para adultos. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2011;77(4):432-8.
21. Ventry IM, Weinstein BE. The hearing handicap inventory for the elderly: a new tool. Ear Hear.1982;3(3):128-34.
22. Lopes GL, Santos MIPO. Functionality elderly enrolled in a Family Health Strategy unit according to the level of the International Classification of Functioning. Rev Bras Geriatr Gerontol. 2015;18(1):71-83.
23. Moda I, Mantello EB, Reis ACMB, Isaac ML, Oliveira AA, Hyppolito MA. Assessment of hearing aids users' satisfaction – systematic review. Rev. CEFAC. 2013;15(4):778-85.
24. Dell'Antônia SF, Ikino CMY, Carreirão Filho W. Degree of satisfaction of patients fitted with hearing aids at a high complexity service. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2013;79(5):555-63.
25. Chiossi JSC, Roque FP, Goulart BNG, Chiari BM. Influence of voice and hearing changes in the quality of life of active elderly individuals. Cienc Saúde Coletiva. 2014;19(8):3335-42.
26. Maciel FJ, Januário GC, Henriques CMA, Esteves CC, Silva MA, Carvalho SAS et al. Hearing Health indicators in the State of Minas Gerais: a study by macroregion. Audiol., Commun Res. 2013;18(4):275-84.
27. Jardim IS, Iwahashi JH, Paula VC. Estudo do perfil audiológico de indivíduos atendidos em um serviço de diagnóstico brasileiro. Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2010;14(1):32-7.
28. Samelli AG, Andrade CQ, Pereira MB, Matas CG. Hearing complaints and the audiological profile of the users of an academic health center in the western region of São Paulo. Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2013;17(2):125-30.
29. Mondelli MFCG, Silva LSL. Profile of the patients serviced in a high complexity system. Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2011;15(1):29-34.
30. Gonsalez ECM, Almeida K. Cross-cultural adaptation of the Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ) to Brazilian Portuguese. Audiol., Commun Res. 2015;20(3):215-24.
31. Durisala N, Manchaiah V, Granberg S, Möller K. Determination and classification of the problems experienced by adults with single-sided deafness using ICF classification: an exploratory study using 26 participants. Clin Otolaryngol. 2017;42(3):748-52.
32. Fonseca ICDA, Cruz ECFR, Chaves SPL, Macêdo MLM, Pontes ES, Holanda CM et al. Hearing and language changes in elderly: integrative review. RIASE. 2019;5(1):1708-26.
33. Jaiswal A, Fraser S, Wittich W. Barriers and facilitators that influence social participation in older adults with dual sensory impairment. Front. Educ. 2020;127(5):1-11.
34. Convery E, Keidser G, Hickson L, Meyer C. The relationship between hearing loss self-management and hearing aid benefit and satisfaction. Am J Audiol. 2019;28(2):274-84.
35. Preminger JE, Meeks S. Evaluation of an audiological rehabilitation program for spouses of people with hearing loss. J Am Acad Audiol. 2010;21(5):315-28.
36. Bernardi SA, Pupo AC, Trenche MCB, Barzaghi L. The use of ICF in the monitoring of hearing and language development in children in their first year of life. Rev. CEFAC. 2017;19(2):159-70.
37. Mitra S, Shakespeare T. Remodeling the ICF. Disabil Health J. 2019;12(3):337-9.
38. Prodinger B, Cieza A, Oberhauser C, Bickenbach J, Üstün TB, Chatterji S et al. Toward the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) rehabilitation set: a minimal generic set of domains for rehabilitation as a health strategy. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016;97(6):875-84.
39. Abdi S, Spann A, Borilovic J, de Witte L, Hawley M. Understanding the care and support needs of older people: a scoping review and categorisation using the WHO international classification of functioning, disability and health framework (ICF). BMC geriatrics [periodico na Internet]. 2019 [citado em 20 de Agosto de 2020]; 19(1):[aproximadamente 15 p.]. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-019-1189-9.
Submitted date:
17/06/2020
Accepted date:
19/11/2020
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Mendeley
Email