Revista CEFAC
https://revistacefac.org.br/article/doi/10.1590/1982-0216/202123313620
Revista CEFAC
Original Articles

Temporal processing skills in people who stutter

Habilidades do processamento temporal em pessoas que gaguejam

Thaís Nunes Machado Ferreira; Larissa Roberta Pereira Rodrigues; Débora Vasconcelos Correia; Suellen Mary Marinho dos Santos Andrade; Giorvan Anderson dos Santos Alves; Marine Raquel Diniz da Rosa

Downloads: 0
Views: 415

Abstract

Purpose:  to investigate the auditory skills of temporal resolution and ordering in people who stutter.

Methods:  an observational, cross-sectional, analytical, and comparative research between study and control groups conducted at a speech-language-hearing teaching clinic of an academic institution, comprising people who stutter (who attended a public outreach program) and volunteers without communicative disorders, for 13 months. The procedures used were auditory perception anamnesis, acoustic immittance, and pure-tone and speech audiometry to discharge hearing changes. The participants who met the eligibility criteria had their resolution and ordering skills assessed with the Gaps-in-Noise, Random Gap Detection, Pitch Pattern Sequence, and Duration Pattern Sequence tests and the data obtained were entered into a spreadsheet for descriptive and inferential statistical analyses.

Results:  the study group presented changes in temporal resolution and ordering. A statistically significant difference was also verified comparing the assessment findings of the study and control groups, in all the assessment tests.

Conclusion:  temporal resolution and ordering changes were observed in the people presented with stuttering, regardless of sex or chronological age.

Keywords

Stuttering; Auditory Perception; Hearing; Speech Perception; Audiology; Speech

Resumo

Stuttering; Auditory Perception; Hearing; Speech Perception; Audiology; Speech

RESUMO

Objetivo:  investigar as habilidades auditivas de resolução e ordenação temporal em pessoas que gaguejam.

Métodos:  estudo observacional transversal analítico e comparativo entre o grupo estudo e o controle. Realizado numa Clínica-Escola de Fonoaudiologia de uma instituição de ensino com pessoas que gaguejam atendidos em projeto de extensão universitária, bem como por voluntários sem distúrbio de comunicação, no período de 13 meses. Os procedimentos realizados foram anamnese de percepção auditiva, imitanciometria, audiometria tonal e vocal para descartar alteração na audição. Para os participantes que atenderam aos critérios de elegibilidade, realizou-se a avaliação das habilidades de resolução e ordenação com os seguintes testes: Gaps in Noise; Random Gap Detection TestPitch Pattern Sequence; e Duration Pattern Sequence. Após a realização dos testes descritos acima, os dados obtidos foram alocados em planilha digital para análise estatística descritiva e inferencial.

Resultados:  o grupo estudo apresentou alteração nas habilidades de resolução e ordenação temporal. Verificou-se, também, a diferença estatisticamente significante nos achados avaliativos dos grupos estudo e controle, quando comparados, para todos os testes realizados nas avaliações.

Conclusão:  observou-se alteração das habilidades de resolução e ordenação temporal nos indivíduos com gagueira, independentemente do gênero ou idade cronológica.

Palavras-chave

Gagueira; Percepção Auditiva; Audição; Percepção da Fala; Audiologia; Fala

Referencias

1. Bloodstein O, Ratner NB. A Handbook on Stuttering. 6. ed. Clifton Park, NY: Thomson Delmar Learning; 2008.

2. Smith A, Weber C. How stuttering develops: the multifactorial dynamic pathways model. J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res. 2017;60(9):2483-505. https://doi.org/10.1044/2017_JSLHR-S-16-0343.

3. Howell P. Screening, diagnosis, prognosis and therapy for stuttering from a neurodevelopmental perspective. Frontiers in Developmental Psychology. 2023;14:1-17. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1158223.

4. Belyk M, Kraft SJ, Brown S. Stuttering as a trait of Laryngeal Motor Cortex. NeuroImage. 2017;158:342-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.07.019.

5. Etchell A, Adhikari A, Weinberg LS, Choo AL, Garnett EO, Chow HM et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of voxel-based morphometric studies of developmental stuttering. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2018;39(6):2651-71. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.24031.

6. Chang SE, Heron-Delaney M, Jost LB, Choo AL, Garnett EO, Chow HM et al. Development of Brain Structural Connectivity in children who stutter: a longitudinal diffusion tensor imaging study. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 2019;13:1-12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2019.00407.

7. Salmelin R, Schnitzler A, Schmitz F, Friend J. Single-word reading in developmental stuttering: an activation study using whole-head magnetoencephalography. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2000;12(1):31-48. https://doi.org/10.1162/089892900561752.

8. Somme M, Koch W, Chon H, Chang SE, Von Gudenberg AW, Euler HA et al. Disconnection of speech-relevant brain areas in persistent developmental stuttering. Lancet. 2003;362(9388):937-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14367-0.

9. Jansson-Verkasalo E, Eggers K, Jarvenpaa S, Suominen K, Van den Bergh B, De Nil L et al. Auditory temporal processing in children who stutter: an ERP study. J. Fluency Disord. 2014;41:14-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfludis.2014.07.001.

10. Kikuchi Y, Ogata K, Umesaki T, Yoshiura T, Kenjo M, Okamoto T et al. Spatiotemporal signatures of auditory processing in adults who stutter. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 2011;5:1-11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2011.00155.

11. Jerger J. Clinical experience with impedance audiometry. Arch. Otolaryngol. 1970;92(4):311-24. https://doi.org/10.1001/archotol.1970.04310040005002.

12. Musiek FE, Chermak GD. Handbook of Central Auditory Processing Disorder: Auditory Neuroscience and Clinical Practice. 2. ed. San Diego: Plural Publishing; 2014.

13. Shinn RE, Chermak GD, Musiek FE. Gaps-In-Noise (GIN) performance in children with Central Auditory Processing Disorder and children with normal development. Am. J. Audiol. 2009;18(2):109-20. https://doi.org/10.1044/1059-0889(2009/08-0023).

14. Keith RW. Random Gap Detection Test. St. Louis: Auditec; 2000.

15. Musiek FE, Shinn RE, Jirsa R, Bamiou DE, Baran JA, Zaida E. Gaps-In-Noise (GIN) test: development, clinical utilization, and preliminary data. J. Am. Acad. Audiol. 2005;16(8):636-50. https://doi.org/10.3766/jaaa.16.8.8.

16. Balen SA, Liebel G. Análise de testes de resolução temporal em crianças de 7 a 10 anos de idade. Rev. CEFAC. 2012;14(6):1012-24. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-18462012005000078.

17. Andrade CRF. Gagueira desenvolvimental persistente: fl uência falada versus inteligibilidade da fala. Rev. Soc. Bras. Fonoaudiol. 2010;15(1):114-21. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-80342010000100021.

18. Musiek FE. Frequency (pitch) and duration pattern tests. J. Am. Acad. Audiol. 1994;5(4):265-8.

19. Schochat E. Processamento auditivo central: avaliação fonoaudiológica. In: Ferreira LP, Befi -Lopes DM, Limongi SCO (orgs). Tratado de fonoaudiologia. São Paulo: Roca; 2004. p. 545-55.

20. Corina LM, Fernandes JC. Auditory processing and stuttering: an investigation of auditory temporal resolution and ordering skills in people who stutter. CoDAS. 2021;33(2):1-8. https://doi.org/10.1590/2317-1782/20202020011.

21. Prestes R, Andrade CRF, Santos MF. Processamento auditivo e gagueira desenvolvimental persistente. Rev. CEFAC. 2017;19(1):15-22. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-021620171913916.

22. Giraud AL, Neumann K, Bachoud-Levi AC, Von Gudenberg AW, Euler HA, Lanfermann H et al. Severity of dysfl uency correlates with basal ganglia activity in persistent developmental stuttering. Brain. 2008;104(2):190-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2007.04.005.

23. Arcuri CF, Schochat E, Ribeiro IM, Sassi FC. Temporal resolution in children with developmental stuttering. CoDAS. 2017;29(2):1-6. https://doi.org/10.1590/2317-1782/20172016076.

24. Tahaei AA, Ashayeri H, Pourshahbaz A, Kamali M. Auditory temporal resolution in adults who stutter. J. Fluency Disord. 2014;42:1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfludis.2014.05.002.

25. Andrade CRF, Sassi FC, Juste FS, Ercolin B. Modelamento da fl uência em adultos gagos utilizando taxa de elocução reduzida e feedback auditivo atrasado. Pró-Fono R. Atual. Cient. 2008;20(3):151-6. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-56872008000300003.

26. Siqueira LF, Schochat E. Habilidades de resolução temporal e ordenação temporal em pessoas que gaguejam. Rev. CEFAC. 2020;22(2):1-9. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-0216/202022216619.

27. Howell P, Davis S, Williams R. Auditory feedback effects on the speech of children who stutter. J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res. 2006;49(4):856-68. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2006/061).

28. Foundas AL, Mock JR, Cindass R, Corey DM. Stuttering and auditory processing: a diffusion tensor imaging study. J. Fluency Disord. 2013;38(4):328-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfludis.2013.07.001.

29. Civier O, Tasko SM, Guenther FH. Over-reliance on auditory feedback may lead to stuttering: a simulation study of a neural model of speech production. J. Fluency Disord. 2010;35(3):246-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfludis.2010.05.002.

30. Cai S, Beal DS, Ghosh SS, Guenther FH, Ghosh SS. Impaired auditory-to-motor transformation in individuals who stutter. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 2014;8:1-12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00843.

31. Max L, Wallace M, Vincent I. Sensorimotor adaptation of speech movement trajectories in people who stutter. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 2015;9:1-11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00481.

32. Neef NE, Anwander A, Friederici AD. The neurobiological basis of stuttering: a review of structural and functional connectivity. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 2015;9:1-14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00431.

33. Biermann-Ruben K, Salmelin R, Schnitzler A. Altered motor involvement in speech perception in individuals who stutter. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 2015;9:1-10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00312.

34. Martins JS, Pinheiro MMC, Blasi HF. A utilização de um software infantil na terapia fonoaudiológica de distúrbio do processamento auditivo central. Rev. soc. bras. fonoaudiol. 2008;13(4):398-404. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-80342008000400016.

35. Giraud AL, Neumann K, Bachoud-Levi AC, Von Gudenberg AW, Euler HA, Lanfermann H et al. Severity of dysfluency correlates with basal ganglia activity in persistent developmental stuttering. Brain. 2008;104(2):190-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2007.04.005.

36. Amaral MIR, Martins PMF, Colella-Santos MF. Temporal resolution: assessment procedures and parameters for school-aged children. Braz. j. otorhinolaryngol. 2013;79(3):317-24. https://doi.org/10.5935/1808-8694.20130057.


Submitted date:
05/11/2020

Accepted date:
05/04/2021

6a0a09b6a953954ae055c714 cefac Articles

Revista CEFAC

Share this page
Page Sections