Accuracy of screening instruments in identifying central auditory processing disorders: an integrative literature review
Thalinny da Costa Silva; Aryelly Dayane da Silva Nunes; Thainá Ruth França de Farias; Ana Beatriz Santos; Karinna Veríssimo Meira Taveira; Sheila Andreoli Balen
Abstract
Purpose: to assess the literature about the accuracy of screening instruments for identifying the Central Auditory Processing Disorders (CAPD).
Methods: search strategies were performed in the following databases: CINAHL, LILACS, PubMed /MEDLINE, Scopus, Speechbite and Web of Science. A search was also carried out in the grey literature. Four independent reviewers selected the included articles using a two-phase process based on the eligibility criteria. Two reviewers independently collected the required information from the included articles. The diagnostic methods were minimal batteries of behavioral tests to assess auditory processing skills.
Results: from 1,366 articles found on all databases, after analysis of title and abstract, 36 were selected for the next phase, when 5 articles were finally included. It was found that the studies included were related to five instruments applied in children. The specificity was higher than 70%, but just the Mottier test and Screening Test for Auditory Processing (STAP), and Screening Checklist for Auditory Processing (SCAP) showed sensibility higher than 70%.
Conclusion: Mottier was the most accurate CAPD screening test. There was no homogeneity in the presentation of the pass/fail criterion, or in the gold reference test used to establish the presence of CAPD.
Keywords
Referências
[Core References]
1. British Society of Audiology. Position Statement and Practice Guidance Auditory Processing Disorder (APD). Br Soc Audiol. [journal on the internet] 2018. [accessed on 2021 March 3] [about 19p.] Available at: https://www.thebsa.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/Position-Statement-and-Practice-Guidance-APD-2018.pdf
2. Neijenhuis K, Campbell NG, Cromb M, Luinge MR, Moore DR, Rosen S et al. An evidence-based perspective on “misconceptions” regarding pediatric auditory processing disorder. Front Neurol. 2019;10:287. DOI:10.3389/fneur.2019.00287.
3. ICD-10-CM Codes. 2020 ICD-10-CM Diagnosis Code H93.25: Central auditory processing disorder. [accessed on 2021 March 3] Available at: https://www.icd10data.com/ICD10CM/Codes/H60-H95/H90-H94/H93-/H93.25.
4. Musiek F, Gollegly KM, Ross MK. Profile of types of central auditory processing disorders in children with learning disabilities. J Commun. 1985;9(1):43-63. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2007.12.007.
5. Keith RW. SCAN: A Screening Test for Auditory Processing Disorders. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation, Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich, Inc. 1986.
6. O’Hara B, Mealings K. Developing the auditory processing domains questionnaire (APDQ): a differential screening tool for auditory processing disorder. Int J Audiol. 2018;57(10):764-75. DOI: 10.1080/14992027.2018.1487087.
7. Smoski WJ, Brunt MA, Tannahill JC. Children’s auditory performance scale. Tampa, FL: Educational Audiology Association. 1992.
8. Barker MD, Purdy SC. An initial investigation into the validity of a computer-based auditory processing assessment (Feather Squadron). Int J Audiol. 2016;55(3):173-83. DOI: 10.3109/14992027.2015.1074734.
9. Amaral MIR, Carvalho NG, Colella-Santos MF. Computer-based central auditory processing screening for school-age children (audBility): an initial investigation. CoDAS. 2019;31(2):1-11. DOI: 10.1590/2317-1782/20182018157.
10. Pereira LD. Processamento auditivo. Temas Desenvol. 1993;2(11):7-14. DOI: 10.1590/S1808-86942011000300015.
11. Volpatto FL, Rechia IC, Lessa AH, Soldera CLC, Ferreira MID da C, Machado MS. Questionnaires and checklists for central auditory processing screening used in Brazil: a systematic review. Braz J Otorhinol. 2019;85(1):99-110. DOI:10.1016/j.bjorl.2018.05.003.
12. Carvalho NG, Ubiali T, Amaral MIR, Colella-Santos MF. Procedures for central auditory processing screening in schoolchildren. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2019;85(3):319-28.
13. Musiek F, Gollegly KM, Lamb LE, Lamb P. Selected issues in screening for central auditory processing dysfunction. Semin Hear. 1990;11(4):372-84.
14. Lessler K. Health and education screening of school-age children - Definition and objectives. Am J Public Health. 1972;62(2):191-8. DOI: 10.2105 / ajph.62.2.191
15. Greenhalgh T, Peacock R. Effectiveness and efficiency of search methods in systematic reviews of complex evidence: audit of primary sources. BMJ. 2005;331(7524):1064-5. DOI:10.1136/bmj.38636.593461.68.
16. Ouzzani M, Hammady H, Fedorowicz Z, Elmagarmid A. Rayyan-a web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Syst Rev. 2016;5(1):1-10. DOI:10.1186/s13643-016-0384-4.
17. Domitz DM, Schow RL. A new CAPD Battery-Multiple Auditory Processing Assessment. Am J Audiol. 2000;9(2):101-11. DOI:10.1044/1059-0889(2000/012).
18. Kiese-Himmel C, Nickisch A. Diagnostic accuracy of a test set to classify children with auditory processing disorders (APD). Laryngo Rhino Otol. 2015;94(6):373-7. DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1387766.
19. Ahmmed AU, Ahmmed AA. Setting appropriate pass or fail cut-off criteria for tests to reflect real life listening difficulties in children with suspected auditory processing disorder. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2016;84:166-73. DOI:10.1016/j.ijporl.2016.03.014.
20. Ahmmed AU. Intelligibility of degraded speech and the relationship between symptoms of inattention, hyperactivity/impulsivity and language impairment in children with suspected auditory processing disorder. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2017;101:78-85. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2017.08.010
30. Moore DR, Hunter LL. Auditory processing disorder (APD) in children: a marker of neurodevelopmental syndrome. Hear Balance Commun. 2013;11(3):160-7. DOI: 10.3109/21695717.2013.821756.
21. Yathiraj A, Maggu AR. Validation of the Screening Test for Auditory Processing (STAP) on school-aged children. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2014;78(3):479-88. DOI:10.1016/j.ijporl.2013.12.025.
22. Yathiraj A, Maggu AR. Screening Test for Auditory Processing (STAP): a preliminary report. J Am Acad Audiol. 2013;24(9):867-78. DOI:10.3766/jaaa.24.9.10.
23. Hochman B, Nahas FX, Oliveira Filho RS, Ferreira LM. Desenhos de pesquisa. Acta Cir Bras. 2005;20(2):2-8.
24. Shaikh MA, Baker B, Levya A. Comparison of Questionnaire-Based and Performance-Based Screening Tools as predictors of auditory processing disorder. Am J Audiol. [journal on the internet] 2020 [accessed on 2021 March 3]; 29(2):143-51. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1044/2019_AJA-19-00025
25. ASHA. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (Central) Auditory Processing Disorders. [Homepage on the Internet] 2005. [accessed on 2021 March 3]. Available at: http://www.asha.org/members/deskref-journals/deskref/default.
26. AAA. American Academy of Audiology Clinical Practice Guidelines: Diagnosis, Treatment and Management of Children and Adults with Central Auditory Processing Disorder. Am Acad Audiol. [journal on the internet] 2010 [accessed on 2021 March 3]; 1-51p. Available at: https://audiology-web.s3.amazonaws.com/migrated/CAPD%20Guidelines%208-2010.pdf_539952af956c79.73897613.pdf
27. Moore DR. Guest Editorial: Auditory processing disorder. Ear Hear. 2018;39(4):617-20. DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000582.
28. Iliadou V, Chermak GD, Bamiou DE, Rawool VW, Ptok M, Purdy S et al. Letter to the editor: an affront to scientific inquiry RE: Moore DR. (2018) Editorial: Auditory processing disorder. Ear Hear. 2018;39(6):1236-42. DOI:10.1097/AUD.0000000000000644.
29. de Wit E, van Dijk P, Hanekamp S, Visser-Bochane MI, Steenberg B, van der Schans CP et al. Same or different: the overlap between children with auditory processing disorders and children with other developmental disorders: a systematic review. Ear Hear. 2018;39(1):1-19. DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000479.
[Appendix 2 Excluded Articles References]
1. Abramson MK, Lloyd PJ. Development of a Pitch Discrimination Screening Test for Preschool Children. J Am Acad Audiol. 2016;27(4):281-92. DOI: 10.3766/jaaa.14052.
2. Amos NE, Humes LE. SCAN test-retest reliability for first- and third-grade children. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1998 Aug;41(4):834-45.
3. Arnott WL, Henning CA, Wilson WJ. Screening and assessing for (central) auditory processing disorder and the role of the speech-language pathologist. J Clin Pract Speech-Language Pathol. 2014;16(2):66-72.
4. Barry JG, Tomlin D, Moore DR, Dillon H. Use of Questionnaire-Based Measures in the Assessment of Listening Difficulties in School-Aged Children. Ear Hear. 2015;36(6):e300-13.
5. Carlin MF, Saniga RD. Teachers’ perception of auditory problems and the SCAN. Percept Mot Skills. 1997 Aug;85(1):245-6. DOI:10.2466/pms.1997.85.1.245.
6. Emerson MF, Candrall KK, Seikel FT, Chermak GD. Observations on the use of SCAN to identify children at risk for central auditory processing disorder... Screening Test for Auditory Processing Disorders. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 1997;28(1):43-9.
7. Garbaruk ES, Goykhburg MV, Warzybok A, Tavartkiladze GA, Pavlov PV, Kollmeier B. The application of the screening questionnaires for the diagnostics of the central auditory processing disorders in the pediatric practice. Vestn Otorinolaringol. 2018;83(4):43-50.
8. Lucas PA, Zacare CC, Alves Filho OC, Amantini RCB, Bevilacqua MC, Zaidan E. Scan: Performance profile of children with seven to eight years. Pro-Fono R. Atual. Cientif. 2007;19(4):370-3.
9. Marriage J, King J, Briggs J, Lutman ME. The reliability of the SCAN test: results form a primary school population in the UK. Br J Audiol. 2001;35(3):199-208. DOI: 10.1080/00305364.2001.11745237.
10. Meister H, von Wedel H, Walger M. Psychometric evaluation of children with suspected auditory processing disorders (APDs) using a parent-answered survey. Int J Audiol. 2004 Sep;43(8):431-7.
11. Moncrieff D, Miller E, Hill E. Screening Tests Reveal High Risk Among Adjudicated Adolescents of Auditory Processing and Language Disorders. J Speech, Lang Hear Res. 2018;61(4):924-35. Available at: DOI:10.1044/2017_JSLHR-H-17-0098.
12. Mourad M, Hassan M, El-Banna M, Asal S, Hamza Y. Screening for auditory processing performance in primary school children. J Am Acad Audiol. 2015;26(4):355-69. DOI: 10.3766/jaaa.26.4.4.
13. Nickisch A, Kiese-Himmel C, Schönweiler R, Gross M, Radü HJ. Zusammenhänge zwischen “anamnesebogen für auditive verarbeitungs- und wahrnehmungsstörungen” und „Heidelberger lautdifferenzierungste. Laryngorhinootologie. 2005;84(7):487-92. DOI 10.1055/s−2005−861021.
14. Nickisch A, Heuckmann C, Burger T, Massinger C. Münchner Auditiver Screeningtest für Verarbeitungs-und Wahrnehmungsstörungen (MAUS). Laryngorhinootologie. 2006;85(4):253-9. DOI 10.1055/s-2005-870565.
15. Nunes CL, Pereira LD, Carvalho GS. Scale of Auditory Behaviors and auditory behavior tests for auditory processing assessment in Portuguese children. CoDAS. 2013;25(3):209-15.
16. Obuchi C, Kaga K. Development of a questionnaire to assess listening difficulties in adults with auditory processing disorder. Hear Balanc Commun. 2019;18(1):29-35. DOI:10.1080/21695717.2019.1663055.
17. O’Hara B, Mealings K, O’Hara B, Mealings K. Developing the auditory processing domains questionnaire (APDQ): a differential screening tool for auditory processing disorder. Int J Audiol. 2018;57(10):764-75. DOI: 10.1080/14992027.2018.1487087.
18. Preclik M, Rosanowski F, Dollinger M, Eysholdt U, Kummer P. Anamnesebogen für auditive Verarbeitungs- und Wahrnehmungsstörungen. HNO. 2008;56(6):638-44. DOI 10.1007/s00106-008-1753-7.
19. Rickard NA, Smales CJ, Rickard KL. A computer-based auditory sequential pattern test for school-aged children. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2013;77(5):838-42. DOI:10.1016/j.ijporl.2013.02.024.
20. Rutkowska J, Łobaczuk-Sitnik A, Kosztyła-Hojna B. Application of Brain-Boy Universal Professional in preliminary assessment of auditory processing disorder [Zastosowanie Brain-Boy Universal Professional we wstępnej ocenie zaburzeń przetwarzania słuchowego]. Pol Merkur Lekarski. 2017;43(255):120-4.
21. Shaikh MA, Baker B, Levya A. Comparison of Questionnaire-Based and Performance-Based Screening Tools as Predictors of Auditory Processing Disorder...American Speech-Language-Hearing Association’s Convention 2018, November 15–17, Boston, MA. Am J Audiol. 2020;29(2):143-51. DOI:10.1044/2019_AJA-19-00025.
22. Skarzynski PH, Wlodarczyk AW, Kochanek K, Pilka A, Jedrzejczak WW, Olszewski L, et al. Central auditory processing disorder (CAPD) tests in a school-age hearing screening programme - analysis of 76,429 children. Ann Agric Environ Med. 2015;22(1):90-5. DOI:10.5604/12321966.1141375.
23. Sofokleous V, Marmara M, Panagiotopoulos GK, Mouza S, Tsofidou M, Sereti A, et al. Test-retest reliability of the Greek Speech-in-babble test (SinB) as a potential screening tool for auditory processing disorder. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2020 Apr;131:109848. DOI:10.1016/j.ijporl.2019.109848
24. Strange AK, Zalewski TR, Waibel-Duncan MK. Exploring the usefulness of Fisher’s Auditory Problems Checklist as a screening tool in relationship to the Buffalo Model Diagnostic Central Auditory Processing Test Battery. J Educ Audiol. 2009;15:44-52.
25. Vaidyanath R, Yathiraj A. Screening checklist for auditory processing in adults (SCAP-A): Development and preliminary findings. J Hear Sci. 2014;4(1):27-37.
26. Wilson WJ, Jackson A, Pender A, Rose C, Wilson J, Heine C, et al. The CHAPS, SIFTER, and TAPS-R as predictors of (C)AP skills and (C)APD. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2011;54(1):278-91.
27. Yathiraj A, Maggu AR. Comparison of a screening test and screening checklist for auditory processing disorders. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2013;77(6):990-5. DOI:10.1016/j.ijporl.2013.03.028.
28. Yathiraj A, Maggu AR. Screening Test for Auditory Processing (STAP): a preliminary report. J Am Acad Audiol. 2013;24(9):867-78. DOI: 10.3766/jaaa.24.9.10.
Submetido em:
11/10/2020
Aceito em:
08/03/2021
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Mendeley
Email