Pressure and resistance of the lips in subjects with and without occlusal change
Pressão e resistência dos lábios em sujeitos com e sem alteração oclusal
Clarissa Evelyn Bandeira Paulino; José Rodrigues Laureano Filho; Laís de Fátima Fonseca de Menezes; Alípio Miguel da Rocha Neto; Luciana Moraes Studart-Pereira
Abstract
Objective: to evaluate the resistance and pressure of the lips in Class I, II and III Angle's malocclusion subjects, in comparison to reference values and relate them with gender and age.
Methods: a quantitative, descriptive and cross-sectional study. Participants included 40 subjects, 20 women and 20 men, average age 26.3 years, separated by occlusal classification. The volunteers answered on the self-reported performance of the stomatognathic functions and were submitted to the evaluation of the mobility and posture of the lips. Pressure and resistance were measured with the Iowa Oral Performance Instrument (IOPI) and the results compared to the reference values described in the instrument´s manual. The data were analyzed descriptively and, for inferential analysis, Pearson's Chi-Square test was used. The significance level was considered 5%.
Results: a decrease in pressure and resistance values was observed in all patients, including Angle's class I group. There was an inverse relationship between the age of the subjects and the values of pressure of lips with statistical significance (p = 0.02). In general, women had lower pressure values than men.
Conclusion: all study subjects had lower pressure of the lips than the reference values described in the literature.
Keywords
Resumo
Objetivo: avaliar a pressão e resistência dos lábios em sujeitos com má oclusão classe I, II e III de Angle, comparativamente a valores de referência e relacioná-las com sexo e idade.
Métodos: estudo quantitativo, descritivo e transversal. Participaram 40 sujeitos, 20 mulheres e 20 homens, idade média 26,3 anos, separados pela classificação oclusal. Os voluntários responderam sobre queixa autorreferida de desempenho das funções estomatognáticas e foram submetidos à avaliação da mobilidade e postura dos lábios. Pressão e resistência foram aferidas com Iowa Oral Performance Instrument (IOPI) e os resultados comparados aos valores de referência descritos no manual do referido equipamento. Os dados foram analisados descritivamente e, para análise inferencial, utilizou-se o teste Qui-Quadrado de Pearson. Considerou-se nível de significância de 5%.
Resultados: foi possível observar diminuição dos valores de pressão e resistência em todos os participantes, inclusive no grupo classe I de Angle. Foi encontrada uma relação inversa entre a idade dos sujeitos e os valores de pressão de lábios com significância estatística (p=0,02). De uma maneira geral, as mulheres apresentaram valores de pressão mais baixos que os homens.
Conclusão: todos os sujeitos do estudo apresentaram valores de pressão labial inferiores aos de referência, descritos na literatura.
Palavras-chave
Referências
1. Philipp-Dormston WG, Hilton S, Nathan M. A prospective, open-label, multicenter, observational, postmarket study of the use of a 15 mg/mL hyaluronic acid dermal filler in the lips. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2014;13(2):125-34.
2. Prandini EL, Totta T, Bueno MRS, Rosa RR, Giglio LD, Trawitzki LVV et al. Analysis of tongue pressure in brazilian young adults. CoDAS. 2015;27(5):478-82.
3. Berwi LC, Ritzel RA, Silva AMT, Mezommo CL, Côrrea ECR, Serpa EO. Usual tongue and lips position in anteroposterior and vertical growth patterns. Rev. CEFAC. 2015;17(Supl1):107-14.
4. Rezende MS, Carvalho LC, Prado RAM, Rocha CBJ, Silva VR, Lunes DH. Isostretching method effects on lung function and posture of mouth breathers. ConScientiae Saúde. 2016;15(1):89-95.
5. Imbaud TCS, Mallozi MC. Frequência de rinite e alterações orofaciais em pacientes com má oclusão dentária. Rev Paul Pediatr. 2016;34(2):184-8.
6. Migliorucci RR, Sovinski SRP, Passos DCBDO, Bucci AC, Salgado MH, Nary Filho H et al. Orofacial functions and quality of life in oral health in subjects with dentofacial deformity. CoDAS. 2015;27(3):255-9.
7. Prado DGDA, Sovinski SRP, Nary Filho H, Brasolotto AG, Felix GB. Oral motor control and orofacial functions in individuals with dentofacial deformity. Audiol., Commun. Res. 2015;20(1):76-83.
8. Trench JA, Araújo RPC. Dentofacial deformities: orofacial myofunctional characteristics. Rev. CEFAC. 2015;17(4):1202-14.
9. Domann J, Cruz CM, Crepaldi MV, Crepaldi MLS, Oliveira BLS. Mordida aberta anterior, etiologia, diagnóstico e tratamento precoce. Rev. FAIPE. 2016;6(2):1-14.
10. Pacheco MCT, Fiorott BS, Finck NS, Araújo MTM. Craniofacial changes and symptoms of sleep-disordered breathing in healthy children. Dental Press J Orthod. 2015;20(3):80-7.
11. Silva MFN, Toni LDM. Fonoaudiologia e cirurgia ortognática: revisão de literatura. Rev. bras. cir. plást. 2018;33(3):404-13.
12. Šidlauskienė M, Smailienė D, Lopatienė K, Čekanauskas E, Pribuišienė R, Šidlauskas M. Relationships between malocclusion, body posture. Rev. Medical Science Monitor: International medical journal of experimental and clinical research. 2015;21:1765-73.
13. Sjögreen L, Lohmander A, Kiliaridis S. Exploring quantitative methods for evaluation of lip function. J Oral Rehab. 2011;38(6):410-22.
14. Lambrechts H, De Baets E, Fieuws S, Willems G. Lip and tongue pressure in orthodontic patients. Eur J Orthod. 2010;32(4):466-71.
15. Clark HM, Solomon NP. Age and sex differences in orofacial strength. Dysphagia. 2012;27(1):2-9.
16. Adams V, Mathisen B, Baines S, Lazarus C, Callister R. A systematic review and meta-analysis of measurements of tongue and hand strength and endurance using the Iowa Oral Performance Instrument (IOPI). Dysphagia. 2013;28(3):350-69.
17. Magalhães Junior VH, Tavares JC, Magalhães AAB, Galvão HC, Ferreira MAF. Characterization of tongue pressure in the elderly. Audiol., Commun. Res. 2014;19(4):375-9.
18. Genaro KF, Berretin-Felix G, Rehder MIBC, Marchesan IQ. Avaliação miofuncional orofacial: protocolo MBGR. Rev. CEFAC. 2009;11(2):237-55.
19. IOPI Northwest. Iowa oral performance instrument: user's manual. Carnation: IOPI Northwest; 2011.
20. Reis VS, Araújo TG, Furlan RMMM, Motta AR. Correlation between tongue pressure and electrical activity of the suprahyoid muscles Rev. CEFAC. 2017;19(6):792-800.
21. Partal I, Aksu M. Changes in lips cheeks and tongue pressures after upper incisor protusion in Class II division 2 malocclusion: a prospective study. Progress in orthodontics. 2017;18(29):2-8.
22. Aktosun T, Machuca A, Sacks P. Determining the shapof a human vocal tract from pressure measurements at the lips. Inverse Problems. 2017;33(11):1-47.
23. Takahashi M, Koide K, Suzuki H, Satoh Y, Iwasaki S. Evaluation of reliability of perioral muscle pressure measurements using a newly developed device with a lip piece. Acta Bioeng Biomech. 2016;18(1):1-9.
24. Jeong D-M, Shin Y-J, Lee N-R, Choung H-W, Pang K-M, Bong J-K et al. Maximal strenght and endurance scores of the tongue, lip, and cheek in healthy, normal koreans. J koreanassoc oral maxilofacsurg. 2017;43(4):221-8.
25. Starmer H, Lyford-Pike S, Ishii LE, Byrne PA, Bohaene KD. Quantifying labial strenght and function in facial paralysis: Effect of targeted lip injection augmentation. JAMA facial plastsurg. 2015;17(4):274-8.
26. Ferreira LM, Pereira HSG, Sena PPM. Estudo cefalométrico das características tegumentares de pacientes com má oclusão de Classe III. Rev. odontol. UNESP. 2014;43(2):98-104.
27. Melo DG, Bianchini EMG. Relationship between electrical activity of the temporal and masseter muscles, bite force, and morphological facial index. CoDAS. 2016;28(4):409-16.
28. Takeuchi G, Kobayashi T, Hasebe D, Funayama A, Mikami T, Saito C. Changes in maximum lip closing force following orthognathic surgery in patients with jaw deformities. J Oral Maxillofac Surg Med Pathol. 2015;27(4):465-9.
29. Rodrigues JA, Silva BNS, Baldrighi SEZM, Paranhos LR, César CPHAR. Interference of mouth breathing with orthodontic treatment duration in Angle Class II, Division 1. Rev. odontol. UNESP. 2017;46(3):184-8.
30. Nakao TH, Bertoz FA, Oliveira DTND, Bertoz APDM, Bigliazzi R. Hábitos bucais como fatores de risco para mordida aberta anterior: uma revisão de literatura. Rev Odontol Arac. 2016;37(2):09-16.
31. Ueki K, Mukozawa A, Okabe K, Miyazaki M, Moroi A, Marukawa K et al. Changes in the lip closing force of patients with Class III malocclusion before and after orthognathic surgery. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2012;41(7):835-8.
32. Jung MH, Yang WS, Nahm DS. Maximum closing force of mentolabial muscles and type of malocclusion. Angle Orthod. 2010;80(1):72-9.
33. Caty G, Salazar GS, Butoescu V, Nonclercq O, Tombal B. Evaluation du bénéfice d'un programme supervisé d'exercices chez des patients recevant une thérapie de déprivation androgénique pour un cancer prostatique. Rev Med Liege. 2019;74(1):36-40.
34. Menezes LDF, Neto AMDR, Paulino CEB, Studart-Pereira LM, Laureano Filho JR. Tongue pressure and endurance in patients with Class II and Class III malocclusion. Rev. CEFAC. 2018;20(2):166-74.
35. Thüer U, Ingervall B. Pressure from the lips on the teeth and malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1986;90(3):234-42.
36. Oliveira BS, Delgado SE, Brescovici SM. Changes of mastication and swallowing in the process of feeding institutionalized elderly. Rev. Bras. Geriatr. Gerontol. 2014;17(3)575-87.
37. Szentesi P, Csernoch L, Dux L, Keller-Pintér A. Changes in Redox Signaling in the skeletal muscle with aging. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2019; 2019:4617801.
38. Larsson L, Degens H, Li M, Salviati L, Lee YIl, Thompson W et al. Sarcopenia: aging-related loss of muscle mass and function. Physiol Rev. 2019;99(1):427-511.
39. Naini FB, Donaldson AN, McDonald F, Cobourne MT. Assesing the influence of lower facial profile convexity on perceived attractiveness in the orthognathic patient, clinican, and layperson. Oral Surg oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2012;114(3):303-11.
Submetido em:
30/06/2018
Aceito em:
27/05/2019
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Mendeley
Email