Quantificação da paralisia facial com paquímetro digital
Facial paralysis quantification by digital paquimeter
Maíra Quintal, Adriana Tessitore, Jorge Rizzato Paschoal, Leopoldo Nizam Pfeilsticker
Resumo
Objetivo: estudar as mensurações feitas manualmente para quantificar as dife-renças entre hemifaces na paralisia facial periférica unilateral (PFP), com compa-ração objetiva da hemiface paralisada à normal.
Método: estudou-se dois grupos, ambos com 30 pacientes. O grupo I constituído de indivíduos normais e o grupo II envolvendo indivíduos apresentando PFP. A “quantificação” da PFP fez-se com o emprego de paquímetro digital para obtenção das medidas em dois movimentos faciais: de sorriso e de contração nasal.
Resultados: nos indivíduos normais, as diferenças entre as medidas foram nulas, quando comparados ambos os lados da face. Os pacientes com paralisia facial apresentaram diferença significativa entre os movimentos da hemiface paralisada quando comparada aos da hemiface normal.
Conclusão: a mensuração manual com paquímetro digital permitiu comparar, de forma objetiva, as diferenças entre os movimentos de sorriso e de contração nasal, entre as hemifaces de indivíduos com PFP unilateral.
Palavras-chave
Abstract
Purpose: to study the handmade measurements, aiming at quantifying the differences between hemifaces at unilateral peripheral facial paralysis (PFP), objectively comparing the paralyzed hemiface to the normal one.
Methods: two 30-patient groups have been studied. Group I comprising normal patients and group II involving those carrying PFP. The PFP “quantification” has been carried out by means of a digital pachymeter to obtain the measures in two facial movements: smile and nasal contraction.
Results: in group I no differences were found between the measures taken, when both sides of the face were compared. In group II there were found significant differences between the movements of the paralyzed hemiface when compared to those of the normal one.
CONCLUSION: handmade measurement with the digital pachymeter has rendered possible to objectively compare the differences between the movements during smile and nasal contraction, between the hemifaces in unilateral PFP individuals.
Keywords
Referencias
1- Diels HJ, Combs D. Neuromuscular retraining for facial paralysis. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 1997;30(5):727-43.
2- Aburto R, Herrera S. Parálisis facial por herpes zoster. Rev Otorrinolaringol Cir Cabeza Cuello. 1990;50(3):117-23.
3- Valença MM, Valença LPAA.Paralisia facial pe riférica idiopática de Bell: a propósito de 180 pacientes. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2001;59(3 B):733-9.
4- Hungria H. Paralisia facial endotemporal. In: Hungria H. Otorrinolaringologia. 6ª. ed. São Paulo, Guanabara Koogan; 1991 p351-62.
5- Kahn JB, Gliklich RE, Boyev KP, Stewart MG, Metson RB, McKenna MJ. Validation of a patient-graded instrument for facial nerve paralysis: the FACE scale. Laryngoscope. 2001;111(3):387-98.
6- Brach JS, Van Sweringen J, Delitto A, Johnson PC. Impairment and disability in patients with facial neuromuscular dysfunction. Otolariyngol Head Neck Surg. 1997;117(4):315-21.
7- House JW, Brackmann DE. Facial nerve grading system. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1985;93(2):146-7.
8- Satoh Y, Kanzanki J, Yoshihara S. A comparision and conversion table of ‘the House Brackmann Facial nerve grading system’ and ’the Yanagihara grading system’. Auris Nasus Larynx. 2000:27(3);207-12.
9- Ross B, Fradet A, Nedzelski JM. Development of a sensitive clinical facial grading system. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1996;114(3): 380-6.
10- Kayhan FT, Zurakowski D, Rauch SD. Toronto facial grading system: interobserver reliability. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2000;122(2): 212-5.
11-Fields MJ, Peckitt NS. Facial nerve function index: a clinical measurement of facial nerve activity in patients with facial nerve palsies. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1990;69(6):681-2.
12- Johnson PC, Brown H, Kuzon WM Jr, Balliet R, Garrison JL, Campbelll J. Simultaneous quantification of facial movements: the maximal static response assay of facial nerve function. Ann Plast Surg. 1994;32(2):171-9.
13- Bajaj-Luthra A, Mueller T, Johnson PC. Quantitative analysis of facial motion components: anatomic and nonatomic motion in normal persons and in patients with comple te facial paralysis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1997;99(7):1894-902; discussion p. 1903-4.
14- Johnson PJ, Bajai-Luthra A, Llull R, Johnson PC. Quantitative facial motion analysis after functional free muscle reanimation procedures. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1997;100(7):1710-9; discussion p. 1720-2.
15- Bajaj-Luthra A, VanSwearingen J, Thornton RH, Johnson PC. Quantitation of patterns of facial movement in patients with ocular to oral synkinesis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998;101(6):1473-80.
16- Yuen K, Inokuchi I, Maeta M, Kawakami SI, Masuda Y. Evaluation of facial palsy by moiré topography index. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1997;117(5):567-72.
17- Frey M, Giovanoli P, Gerber H, Slameczka M, Stüssi E. Three-dimensional video analysis of facial movements: a new method to asses the quantity and quality of the smile. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999;104(7):2032-9.
18- Linstrom CJ, Silverman CA, Susman WM. Facial –motion analysis with a video and computer system: a preliminary report. Am J Otol. 2000;21(1):123-9.
19- Linstrom CJ. Objective facial motion analysis in patients with facial nerve disfunction. Laryngoscope. 2002;112(7Pt1):1129-47.
20- Linstrom CJ, Silverman CA, Colson D. Facial motion analysis with a video and computer system after treatment of acoustic neuroma. Otol Neurotol. 2002;23(4):572-9.
21- Wachtman GS, Cohn JF, Van Swearingen JM, Manders EK. Automated tracking of facial features in patients with facial neuromuscular dysfunction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;107(5):1124-33.
22- Castillo-Morales R. Questionário para avaliação do complexo orofacial. In:Castillo-Morales R. Terapia de regulação orofacial. São Paulo: Memnon; 1999. p.107-8.
23- Ward RE. Facial morphology as determined by anthropometry: keeping it simple. J Craniofac Genet Dev Biol. 1989;9(1):45-60.
24- Ward RE, Jamison PL. Measurement precision and reliability in craniofacial anthropometry: implications and suggestions for clinical applications. J Craniofac Genet Dev Biol. 1991;11(3):156-64.
25- Farkas LG, Posnick JC,Hreczko TM. Growth patterns of the face: a morphometric study. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1992;29(4):308-15.
26- Farkas LG, Posnick JC, Hreczko TM, Pron GE. Growth patterns of the nasolabial region: a morphometric study. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1992;29(4);318-24.
27- Arnett GW, Bergman RT. Facial keys to orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning Part II. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1993;103(5):395-411.
28- Suguino R, Ramos AL, Terada HH, Furquin LZ, Maeda L, Silva Filho OG. Análise facial. Rev Dent Press Ortodon Ortop Maxilar 1996;1(1):86-107.
29- Farkas LG, Thompson B, Phillips JH, Katic MJ, Cornfoot ML. Comparision of anthropometric and cephalometric measurements of the adult face. J Craniofac Surg. 1999;10(1):18-25.
30- Reche R , Colombo VL, Verona J,Moresca Cal, Moro A. Análise do perfil facial em fotografias padronizadas. Rev Dent Press Ortodon Ortopedi Facial. 2002;7(1):37-45.
31- Brach JS , VanSwearingen J. Measuring fati gue related to facial muscle function. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1995;76(10):905-8.
32- Cattoni DM. Avaliação quantitativa das estrutu ras orofaciais. In: Krakauer LH, Difrancesco RC, Marchesan, IQ. Respiração oral: abordagem interdisciplinar. São José dos Campos: Pulso; 2003. p.81-90.
Submitted date:
24/03/2003
Accepted date:
02/06/2004
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Mendeley
Email