Revista CEFAC
https://revistacefac.org.br/article/doi/10.1590/1516-1846/200461p0044
Revista CEFAC
Artigo

Efecto de la postura de cabeza en mediciones de la vía aérea

Head Posture effect in airway measurements

Pía Villanueva, Saúl Valenzuela, Hugo Santander, Claudia Zúñiga, María Jose Ravera, Rodolfo Miralles

Downloads: 0
Views: 374

Resumen

Objetivos:  el propósito del presente estudio fue medir diámetros anteroposteriores de la vía aérea faríngea en una muestra de 50 sujetos jóvenes adultos sanos y relacionar estas mediciones con la postura de cabeza.

Metodos:  a cada sujeto se le tomó una radiografía craniocervical lateral en posición natural de cabeza, estando su mandíbula en máxima intercuspidación. Los diámetros de la vía aérea faríngea fueron medidos a siete niveles, desde la tuberosidad maxilar hasta la vallécula de la epiglotis. La postura de cabeza fue determinada a través del ángulo craniovertebral formado por el plano de MacGregor y el plano odontoídeo (ángulo postero inferior). La muestra estudiada fue dividida en tres grupos de acuerdo con el valor del ángulo craniovertebral: extensión de cabeza (< de 95°); postura normal de cabeza (entre 95° y 106°); flexión de cabeza (> de106°).

Resultados:  no se observó una diferencia significativa en ninguna de las mediciones antero-posteriores de la vía aérea faríngea entre los tres grupos de sujetos (ANOVA, p > 0.05). Se observó un significativo efecto del género en la postura de cabeza, presentando las mujeres una mayor frecuencia de postura normal de cabeza y los hombres una mayor frecuencia de flexión de cabeza (test exacto de Fisher, p < 0.01).

Conclusiones:  los resultados del presente estudio sugieren un predominio de los mecanismos de adaptación fisiológicos que permiten mantener permeable la vía aérea en la postura erecta, a pesar de la diferencia significativa de la postura de cabeza en la muestra estudiada.

Palabras clave

Faringe/anatomia; histologia; Cabeza; Postura; Medições; Cefalometria

Abstract

Purpose:  the aim of the present study was to measure the antero-posterior diameters of the pharyngeal airway in a sample of 50 healthy young adults and to examine the relation between these diameters and the head posture.

Methods:  it was taken for each subject a lateral craniocervical radiograph in a self-balanced, natural head position in erect posture, and without a head holder, with the mandible in maximum intercuspation. Pharyngeal airway diameters were measured at seven levels ranging from the maxillary tuberosity to the vallecula of the epiglottis. The studied sample was divided into three groups according to head posture (craniovertebral angle formed by MacGregor and odontoid plane): head extension (less than 95°); normal head posture (between 95° and 106°); head flexion (more than 106°).

Results:  no significant differences in any of the antero-posterior diameters of the pharyngeal airway were observed in the three groups (ANOVA, p > 0.05). A significant gender’s effect on head posture was observed. Females presented higher frequency of normal head posture and males’ higher frequency of head flexion (Fisher’s exact test = 0.002; p < 0.01).

Conclusions:  results of the present study suggest that there is a predominance of the physiological adaptation mechanisms that serve to maintain the functional airway adequacy in erect posture, although the significant differences in head posture in the sample studied.

Keywords

Farynx/anatomy; histology; Head; Posture; Measurements; Cephalometry

Referências

1. Rocabado M. Biomechanical relationship of the cranial, cervical, and hyoid regions. J Craniomandibular Pract 1983;1:61-6.

2. Kaput M. Orthopedic physical therapy. In: Kraus SL. TMJ disorders: management of the craniomandibular complex. London: Churchill Livingstone; 1988. p. 330. (Clinics in Physical Therapy, 18).

3. Manns A, Diaz G. Sistema estomatognático. Santia go: Empigraf; 1983.

4. Darnell MW. A proposed chronology of events for forward head posture. J Craniomandibular Pract 1983;1:49-54.

5. González HE, Manns A. Forward head posture: its structural and functional influence on the stomatognathic system, a conceptual study. Cranio 1996;14:71-80.

6. Shelton RL Jr, Bosma JF. Maintenance of the pharyngeal airway. J Appl Physiol 1962;17:209-14.

7. Hellsing E. Changes in the pharyngeal airway in relation to extension of the head. Eur J Orthod 1989;11:359-65.

8. Liistro G, Stanescu D, Dooms G, Rodenstein D, Veriter C. Head position modifies upper airway resistance in men. J Appl Physiol 1988;64:1285-8.

9. Suratt PM, Gal TJ, Hooe DM. Effect of head flexion on airway resistance measured in a body plethysmograph. Br J Dis Chest 1981;75:204-6.

10. Weber ZJ., Preston CB., Wright PG. Resistance to na sal airflow related to changes in head posture. Am J Orthod 1981;80: 536-45.

11. Pae EK, Lowe AA, Sasaki K, Price C, Tsuchiya M, Fleetham JA. A cephalometric and electromyographic study of upper airway structures in the upright and supine positions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1994;106:52-9.

12. Solow B, Skov S, Ovesen J, Norup PW, Wildschiodtz G. Airway dimensions and head posture in obstructive sleep apnoea. Eur J Orthod 1996;18:571-9.

13. Davies RJ, Stradling JR. The relationship between circumference, radiographic pharyngeal anatomy, and the obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome. Eur Respir J 1990;3:509-14.

14. Miralles R, Zunino P, Santander H, Manns A. Influence of occlusal splints on bilateral anterior temporal EMG activity during swallowing of saliva in patients with craniomandibular dysfunction. Cranio 1991;9:129-36.

15. Miralles R, Mendoza C, Santander H, Zuniga C, Moya H. Influence of stabilization occlusal splints on sternocleidomastoid and masseter electromyographic activity. Cranio 1992;10:297-304.

16. Santader H, Miralles R, Jimenez A, Zuniga C, Rocabado M, Moya H. Influence of stabilization occlusal splint on craniocervical relationships. Part II: Electromyographic analysis. Cranio 1994;12:227-33.

17. Zuniga C, Miralles R, Mena B, Montt R, Moran D, Santander H, Moya H. Influence of variation in jaw posture on sternocleidomastoid and trapezius electromyographic activity. Cranio 1995;13:157-62.

18. Green JD, De Groot J, Sutin J. Trigemino-bulbar reflex pathways. Am J Physiol 1957;189:384-8.

19. Manni E, Palmieri G, Marini R, Pettorossi VE. Trigeminal influences on extensor muscles of the neck. Exp Neurol 1975;47:330-42.

20. Sumino R, Nozaki S. Trigemino-neck reflex: Its peripheral and central organization. In: Anderson DJ, Mathews B, editors. Pain in the trigeminal region. Amsterdam-New York: Elsevier/North-Holland: Biomedical Press; 1977. p. 365.

21. Weeks V, Travell J. Postural vertigo due trigger areas in the sternocleidomastoid muscle. J Pediatr 1960;47:315-27.

22. Kraus SL. Cervical spine influences on the craniomandibular region. In: Kraus SL. TMJ Disorders: management of the craniomandibular complex. London:Churchill Livingstone;1998. p. 367-404. (Clinics in Physical Therapy, 18).

23. Suzuki J, Cohen B. Head, eye, body and limb movements from semicircular canal nerves. Exp Neurol 1964;10:393-405.

24. Holmgren K, Sheikholeslam A, Riise C. An electromyographic study of the immediate effect of an occlusal splint on the postural activity of the anterior temporal and masseter muscles in different body positions with and without visual input. J Oral Rehabil 1985;12:483-90.

25. Miralles R, Valenzuela S, Ramirez P, Santander H, Palazzi C, Ormeño G, Zuniga C. Visual input effect on EMG activity of sternocleidomastoid and masseter muscles in healthy subjects and in patients with myogenic cranio-cervical-mandibular dysfunction. Cranio 1998;16:168-84.


Submetido em:
08/06/2003

Aceito em:
15/10/2003

6a05d9f9a9539567d863d734 cefac Articles

Revista CEFAC

Share this page
Page Sections